请教！

lynnshen77

Q40:

Until mow, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available.  Parents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated.  A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children.  However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

1. Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.
2. The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do.
3. The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.
4. Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.
5. The nasal spray vaccine is mot effective when administered to adults.

ans,b,mine,a

shzzhengfan

气雾剂和注射对小孩没有什么区别--->气雾剂的使用不会带来什么好处。

假设：B ：气雾剂和注射原理也一样。（取非：原理不一样——>气雾剂会带来好处，削弱结论）

A:能用注射法的人能安全使用气雾剂。无关

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-5-14 23:15:35编辑过]

pumpkin

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=74827&page=1

发贴标题请楼主参考这个链接。感谢。