2006年8月队请进！欢迎大家来讨论

jessiebetty

GWD-4  21为什么不是B,谢谢哈

[URL=http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=182550]

jessiebetty

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=182550

顾风

以下是引用biss33在2006-7-19 1:13:00的发言：

问大家一个问题：cd上的人都知道必须要看og的解释，并且看og的解释也是一个自我提高的过程。在我看og的过程中：我发现语法部分的og解释可以帮助我们掌握grammer rules，也就是某位牛仁说的掌握剑谱。逻辑部分的og解释可以帮助我们了解出题的思路分清有关无关选项，大幅度提高解题能力，掌握逻辑的本质规律。可是看了很多阅读部分的og解释，我就是不开窍，不知道到底是去看什么。如果是说看解题思路吧，细节题就是个定位什么的，不需要看那些绕来绕去的解释；infer题除了一些固定的出题模式外，很多都是要根据一篇文章许多零散的信息来自我归纳得出，即使看了解释对于以后做题也没什么帮助（因为看不出规律阿）

那么到底阅读部分的解释要看什么，怎么看呢？

另一点，小安阅读法中曾强调能不能掌握选项中的错项的出题规律能否拿到高分的关键。如果说这个理论用于语法和逻辑我可以理解，比如说知道语法的错误点啦，增强对无关选项的敏感度啦。但是用到阅读我怎么就是难以参透牛人们的用意呢？总结阅读选项中的错项又能有什么帮助呢？（除了主题题）

请大家讲讲自己的经验吧，不胜感激

我想起一个说法，一开始有剑，然后无剑，然后又有剑。。。呵呵，不知道MM现在在哪个境界？

我还在无剑中徘徊，脑袋里面没有所学到的所用到的知识点，现在纯粹凭感觉了，只是在仔细想的时候会发现其实这感觉好象也有很多以前的一些知识积累。。。

我没怎么看过og阅读，只是在第一次看og的时候看了看错题的定位。

顾风

以下是引用jessiebetty在2006-7-19 10:59:00的发言：

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=182550

updated

allen0018

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=24&id=182560

逻辑 谢谢

allen0018

大全-3-5.      A weapons-smuggling
incident recently took place in country Y. We all know that Y is a closed society.
So Y’s government must have known about the weapons.

Which of the following is an assumption
that would make the conclusion above logically correct?

(A) If a
government knows about a particular weapons-smuggling incident, it must have
intended to use the weapons for its own purposes.

(B) If a
government claims that it knew nothing about a particular weapons-smuggling
incident, it must have known everything about it.

(C) If a government does not permit
weapons to enter a country, it is a closed society.

(D) If a
country is a closed society, its government has a large contingent of armed guards patrolling
its borders.（E）

(E) If a country is a closed society,
its government has knowledge about everything that occurs in the country.

这道题，大家能说说究竟怎么推离出来的吗？我逻辑概念有点模糊

allen0018

咱俩的进度一样，错的题都一样

顾风

以下是引用allen0018在2006-7-19 12:02:00的发言：

大全-3-5.      A weapons-smuggling
incident recently took place in country Y. We all know that Y is a closed society.
So Y’s government must have known about the weapons.

Which of the following is an assumption
that would make the conclusion above logically correct?

(A) If a
government knows about a particular weapons-smuggling incident, it must have
intended to use the weapons for its own purposes.

(B) If a
government claims that it knew nothing about a particular weapons-smuggling
incident, it must have known everything about it.

(C) If a government does not permit
weapons to enter a country, it is a closed society.

(D) If a
country is a closed society, its government has a large contingent of armed guards patrolling
its borders.（E）

(E) If a country is a closed society,
its government has knowledge about everything that occurs in the country.

这道题，大家能说说究竟怎么推离出来的吗？我逻辑概念有点模糊

关键是要理解close是什么意思，作为一个continuum，closed country具备了信息的封闭性，和信息的高度集中性，所以可以这么说，在closed country里，凡是涉及到信息外流的较为重要的事件，必须会有信息的备份，所以在closed country里可以说，信息对政府来说是没有隐私的。

jessiebetty

大全１１谢个

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=182576

biss33

以下是引用jessiebetty在2006-7-19 13:16:00的发言：

大全１１谢个

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=182576

update