原来题目如下:
It is true that it is against internationial law to sell plutonium to countries that do not yet have nuclear weapons.But if United States companies do not do so. comanies in other countries will.
Which of the foolowing is most like the argument above in its logical strucure?
A)It is true that it is against the police department's policy to negotiate with kidnappers.But if the police want to prevent loss of life, they must negotiate in some cases.
B) if is true that it is illiegal to refuse to register for military service. but there is a long readitoin in the United States of conscientious objection to serving in the armed foeces.
C) it is true that it is illegal for a government offical to participate in a transaction in which there is an apparent conflict of intest.but if the facts are examined carefully , it will clearly be seen that there was no actual conflict of interest in the defendant's case.
D)it is true that it is against the law to burglarize people's homes. but someone else certainly would have burglarized that house if the defendant had not done so first.
E) it is true that company policy forbids supervisors to fire employees without two written warnings. but there have been many supervisors who have disobeyed this policy.
本人刚刚起步,不熟悉这类题目,请高人前辈不吝指点。万分感激
|