请教大全D-13题，没人问过

flyingceleste

Since the passage of the state’s Clean Air Act ten years ago, the level of industrial pollutants in the air has fallen by an average of 18 percent. This suggests that the restrictions on industry embodied in the act have worked effectively. However, during the same period the state has also suffered through a period of economic decline. The number of businesses in the state has fallen by 10 percent, and the number of workers employed has fallen by 12 percent. It is probable that the business decline, rather than the regulations in the act, is responsible for at least half of the decline in the pollution.

13.   Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn in the passage above?

(A) During the last ten years, economic conditions in the nation as a whole have been worse than those within the state.

(B) Amendments to the Clean Air Act that were enacted six years ago have substantially strengthened its restrictions on industrial air pollution.

(C) Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries.

(D) Several large corporations left the state during the last ten years partly in order to avoid compliance with the Clean Air Act.（C）

(E) Due to its small budget, the state office charged with enforcement of the Clean Air Act has prosecuted only two violators of the law since its passage.

这题答案为C，但觉得恨不严密，C的前提是这5%的公司产生的污染不起重要的作用，可是文中又没提到，所以当初犹豫了下还是选了D，D隐含的意思是这些离开的大公司释放的污染不符合规定，等于是说规定造成了污染的减少，我觉得这里D比C好，请指教！

PS  大全的A~D套题做的那个叫郁闷啊,错的找不着北了

flyingceleste

3ks

jandjshi

以下是引用coopers在2006-3-31 6:19:00的发言：

D is not necessarily correct as conclusion says "at least half of the decline"

C says only 5%, far from 50%, and no matter they mgiht cease business due to pollution act or business decline, it will not draw a coclusion that "for at least half of the..."

I choose D:

C - 5% of ceased business can well represent 50% of the total decline in pollution. If C change to “the businesses that ceased operating in the state during the last ten years only account for 5% of the total decline in the pollution”, then C is the undisputed answer.

D: the assumption of the conclusion:  the decline in the number of business is NOT a result of Clean Air Act. D undermines this assumption.

jandjshi

顶一下. 哪位NN来淡淡看法?

lawyer_1

同意D。

注意C选项中, 关掉的BUSINESSES是Last ten years。而原文指的businesses是last ten years中的某个Ｐeriod。范围扩大了。所以无关。

注意削弱和支持题不要陷入Must be的陷阱。只要所提的问题能增加或削弱结论说服力就行了。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-3 21:05:07编辑过]

jandjshi

多谢lawyer大N. 眼睛真尖.

jandjshi

以下是引用lawyer_1在2006-4-3 21:00:00的发言：

注意削弱和支持题不要陷入Must be的陷阱。只要所提的问题能增加或削弱结论说服力就行了。

lawyer的意思, C若改成Of the businesses that ceased operating in the state during some period in the last ten years, only 5 percent were engaged in air-polluting industries是不是正确哪? 我觉得有点scope shift. 一个讲50% of the 18% decrease in pollution = 9% of decrease in pollution, 一个讲5% of ceased business, 好像不痛不痒的.

huckleberry

I am still confused by D: big companies moved out which contribute to the decline of businesses---doesn't this SUPPORT the conclusion?   

How about "B"? ---the stricter regulation leads to the decline in pollution.

Thanks.

   

fiaoyaya

谢谢lawyer,这道题讲得很透彻

myaska

我想说C里面说“只有5%的停产企业与污染有关”，而并没有说这5%的停产企业造成的污染比重是多少。我可以认为这5%的企业贡献了90%的污染，请问认为C正确的同学你要怎样反驳我。

另外，想请问为什么B是错的？我觉得B跟D要说的是一回事，即因为法律变严格才导致污染减少。反而B的表述更直接一些，D还绕了个圈子才说出来。