ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: kerili
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-11-19,大全-11-20

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2006-8-23 00:14:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得20题关键是把therefore前后的关联因素找出来,那就是low,oil价格low了,导致unless。。。gas price remain low,
加强点应该在这两者的联系中,为什么在价格上有同时low的关联。

天气问题,楼上MM说的我拿不准,感觉是无关,因为即便受天气影响剧烈gas的价格也未必一定要low吧,
个人看法,多多讨论

12#
发表于 2006-8-23 00:21:00 | 只看该作者
刚才没说完,借这里的宝地我还想问一下19题的B,再贴一下题目

    

        It
is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially when a generous patron
donates a potential exhibit. In truth, however, donated objects require storage
space, which is not free, and routine conservation, which is rather expensive.
Therefore, such gifts exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on a
museum’s financial resources.


    

Which of the following, if true, most
seriously weakens the argument above?


    

(A) To keep
patrons well disposed, a museum will find it advisable to put at least some
donated objects on exhibit rather than merely in storage.


    

(B) The people
who are most likely to donate valuable objects to a museum are also the people
who are most likely to make cash gifts to it.


    

(C) A museum
cannot save money by resorting to cheap storage under less than adequate
conditions, because so doing would drive up the cost of conservation.


    

(D) Patrons
expect a museum to keep donated objects in its possession rather than to raise
cash by selling them.
E


    

(E) Objects
donated by a patron to a museum are often of such importance that the museum
would be obliged to add them to its collection through purchase if necessary.


    

题目说得到donated objects也费是,储存什么的都要花钱,所以对这个需求不高,那我用donate的人可能会给money来weaken为什么不对呢,难道是无关选项?一定要非常直接非常正面的weaken therefore讲的内容?
13#
发表于 2006-9-2 15:06:00 | 只看该作者
这两天看了laywer的逻辑,对A的感觉是它只是重复了结论,并没有进一步加强结论。所以是错的。
laywer

附加信息对原文推理的作用类。该类包括SUPPORTWEAKENEVALUATION三种。就是找出下列哪个选项对原文的推理能起作用(WEAKENSUPPORT或两者都有)。它本身有两层意思。一是选项本身或和原文的证据结合对结论起问题所说的作用(支持或作用);多数在这层面上便找到了答案或排除剩下一个。二。并且他们的证明力度比原文单独的证据大或削弱原文的证据证明力,所以简单的重复原文证据(注意:有些正确选项好像重复原文证据,实际是原文证据更强或更弱)不是正确选项。这类的正确选项有两种形式:A是提供另外的证据直接支持或削弱结论,这种情况多数是原文的证据只是背景知识,或和原文的结论相关性不大。B是使原文的证据和结论的距离拉近或拉远,使结论的可能性变大或变小,加大或减少原文证据对结论的证明力。这时要特别注意原文证据对结论的证明角度,最难分的选项常在这里做文章。

 

14#
发表于 2007-2-20 21:31:00 | 只看该作者
up
15#
发表于 2007-6-4 18:56:00 | 只看该作者

想不明白B为什么不对

捐objects的人也捐money,不就解决了financial resource的问题了吗?

还是因为问题里有most seriously weaken,所以是E啊?

说实话我第一眼看E的时候

老兄,不是吧,打击得那么干脆

于是就不知道怎么搞得把他给排除了

16#
发表于 2007-7-23 14:49:00 | 只看该作者
B中make cash gifts 不能说明原文结论中such gifts 就不 exacerbate the demands了,注意 such gifts 中不包括 cash gifts
17#
发表于 2009-3-16 13:21:00 | 只看该作者
D
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 10:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部