ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake's waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.
The argument depends on assuming which of the following?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3685|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD28-9应该选A还是选B,奇怪了怎么觉得都对

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-3-25 09:19:00 | 只看该作者

GWD28-9应该选A还是选B,奇怪了怎么觉得都对

Early in the twentieth century, laceType>LakelaceType> laceName>KonfalaceName> became very polluted.  Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.  Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.  However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.  Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.



The argument depends on assuming which of the following?




  1. Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.

  2. Other than the possibility of a leak, there is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipeline’s construction.

  3. There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in laceType>LakelaceType> laceName>KonfalaceName>.

  4. Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.

  5. The species of fish that are present in laceType>LakelaceType> Konfa now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-3-25 10:30:19编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2006-3-25 09:47:00 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-3-25 10:30:00 | 只看该作者
A 怎么排除呢/??不是也是NOT+WEAKEN么??
地板
发表于 2006-8-28 22:27:00 | 只看该作者

However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.

文章结论是provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless

联系文章的结论和选项, 只有B是ASSUMPTION, A是无关选项

5#
发表于 2007-6-20 16:16:00 | 只看该作者

B, A is irrelevant about pipeline construction.

6#
发表于 2008-12-24 17:01:00 | 只看该作者

为什么不是C呢,在B和C之间徘徊。觉得B有道理,C也有道理。(assumption题老是令我在两个选项之间徘徊)

C,把NO去掉,就是有理由相信在Lake Konfa里安装管道,漏油科技是无效的

不是正好削弱了原文的结论:提供这个技术是有效的,那些担心是没有根据的

谁能教我鉴别一下?

7#
发表于 2008-12-27 21:25:00 | 只看该作者

stimulus concludes: provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless.

provided functions as "if",it leads a premise.we cant question the premise,so the question whether this technology is effective is irrelative.

8#
发表于 2009-6-27 21:36:00 | 只看该作者
UP
9#
发表于 2009-7-27 17:40:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 10:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部