LSAT-26-3-20

rt316

LSAT26-III-20
答案是E
但是原句读不太清楚，第二句话是不是结构有点问题？
Legal rules are expressed in general terms. The concern classification of persons and actions and they prescribe legal consequences for persons and actions falling into the relevant categories. The application of a rule to a particular case, therefore, involves a decision on whether the facts of that case fall within the categories mentioned in the rule. This decision establishes the legal effect of what happened rather than any matter of fact.
The passage provides the most support for which one of the following?
(C) Making a legal decision does not involve matters of fact.
(E) Whether the facts of a case fall into a relevant category is not itself a matter of fact.

dorbear

原句挺难读，但题干比较清楚，所以干嘛非全读懂。这是一个假设型加强题，即正确选项既是原命题的加强，同时又是命题成立的假设。

题干：判案与案件属性有关，而与案件事实无关；
答案：案件属性和案件事实是两回事。

个人意见！