BF题,是否无须把题目通篇看完呢？？？

hhl3000

以下是引用华籍美人在2005-5-25 9:26:00的发言：
做BF题，我有个心得：无须把题目通篇看完，更不用去体会作者的推理思路，太浪费时间了。只要注意boldface周围的句子及具有提示性的词（如转折、总结等），一般都可以判断出来黑体字的作用，此种方法绝对有效，且节省大量时间，正确率达100%！到目前为止，用这种方法我的BF题一般不到1分钟，且就没错过。大家可以试试看！

但是我觉得好象有一大半题不能这么做，大家说对么？？比如以下这个大家说怎么运用这个方法呢？？（我暂时不告诉大家答案）

Q20:

Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty.  It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity.  However, studies show that a disproportionately large number of the scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty entered their field at an older age than is usual.  Since by the age of forty the large majority of scientists have been working in their field for at least fifteen years, the studies’ finding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not that they have simply aged but rather that they generally have spent too long in a given field.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second is an objection that has been raised against a position defended in the argument.

The first is a claim that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is a finding that has been used in support of that position.

The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is a finding that has been used in support of that explanation.

The first is an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is a finding on which that challenge is based.

　E　The first is an explanation that the argument defends; the second is a finding that has been used to challenge that explanation

jjll

不看完全题总是有风险的。如果你牛，不要采取这种策略。如果你看题慢，省下这点时间也许是值得的。

orange2005

呵呵。。。楼主介绍的这种方法超级好用！这是做逻辑题典型的“白痴”思维的具体表现。强力推荐给大家！！

hhl3000

楼上的兄弟　　那你说说我举的这道题怎么做呢？？我感觉好象好多题这种方法不灵啊

orange2005

以下是引用hhl3000在2006-3-10 14:58:00的发言：
楼上的兄弟　　那你说说我举的这道题怎么做呢？？我感觉好象好多题这种方法不灵啊

我选的是D。

第一个BF前面有一个because，就表示是一个解释，这样可以立即排除AB。
第二个BF前面有一个however, studies show，就表示反对第一个BF，这样又可以排除C。一般地，整个题目的重点往往是在however的后面，结论往往是however所表达的内容，所以又可以排除E。最后剩下D。

不知道这个分析怎么样？我感觉有点象“白痴”在做题－－因为不用深入分析整个题目的意思，而只需根据一些关键字来排除错误项。。。呵呵。。。楼主引用的那个“华籍美人”（是美女还是美男？）的BF心得，指的大概就是这个吧。。。

大概的译文：
题目说的是，年龄老化使得科学家丧失了创造能力。但是有事实出来证明不是这样。结论是，科学家超过40岁很少有创造性的成绩，不是因为他们老化，而是因为他们在那个领域从事工作的时间太长了（变得迂腐、木纳了）。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-3-10 18:22:33编辑过]

hhl3000

滑稽美人是女的巴好像  楼上的兄弟能不能说说D E之间你是怎么排除的呢？??/

orange2005

以下是引用hhl3000在2006-3-11 22:51:00的发言：
滑稽美人是女的巴好像  楼上的兄弟能不能说说D E之间你是怎么排除的呢？??/

唉。。。这种方法很“弱智”的，只要看到however这个东东，就直接猜后面的句子是重点（用来challenge、反对前面的句子）即可。
稍微理性一点的话，就花15秒时间扫视一下全文，也很容易直接选D。。。

我这样解释，不知是否理解？

另请楼主把答案贴出来，以饲后来人。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-3-13 10:45:49编辑过]

hhl3000

哈哈　没看我穷追不舍么　　说名你答案对了　　

orange2005

以下是引用hhl3000在2006-3-13 11:15:00的发言：
哈哈　没看我穷追不舍么　　说名你答案对了　　

有空的话，多贴几道BF题上来，大家切磋一下吧？

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-3-13 16:01:32编辑过]

hedge

ding