885 sec12-19

gemj

从逻辑意思上并非假设关系。
C中
superficial if the three major networks all
意思是“如果。。。，则可能肤浅”
言外之意是“如果不同时播同一个东西就不肤浅”
显然不如E好。

joywzy

多谢了。这题我原先一直糊涂呢。

cxj

good job!

freshplayboy

我觉得the sthree major works 是主语，而 each 是他的同位语，所以后面用broadcast

susanyaki

gemj，a wonderful example as you have cited , you have made a mistake here.

in fact, according to OG, "as" is used to compare something, and when so, it is used as conj. so "as when" can be explained as "就和当---------的时候一样" in chinese!! do you agree with me???

susanyaki

P.S.when here is not a adv

vickiyan

有个鬼佬是这么解释C的。（from testmagic.com）

I think C is the part that is confusing people, so let’s flip the sentence around to see a bit more clearly that it’s not correct to use if with can:

If all of the three major networks broadcast the same statement, television can be superficial.

This sentence should read:

If all of the three major networks broadcast the same statement, television will be superficial.

In other word, it’s not correct to use can after if. Let’s look at a simpler example:

If the temperature drops below 0 degrees Celsius, distilled water can or will freeze.

Finally, it’s better to use each than it is to use all, since each network is operating independently, all implies that the networks were working together.

关于each用法，他还举了两个例句，看过就记住了。

Three cats each eat …

Three cats, each of which eats…

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-28 9:40:57编辑过]

boluomeimei

多谢！！！

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-2 16:09:04编辑过]

gonghao

so as to一般必错

还得so。。。。as to主语清晰

livary

以下是引用gonghao在2006-5-23 10:11:00的发言：

so as to一般必错

还得so。。。。as to主语清晰

为什么必错呢? 请问有没有什么根据啊?