ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1363|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

請問一題閱讀GWD9-33

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-1-9 10:46:00 | 只看该作者

請問一題閱讀GWD9-33

Scientists studying the physiology


of dinosaurs have long debated whether


dinosaurs were warm- or cold-blooded.


Line  Those who suspect they were warm-


(5)   blooded point out that dinosaur bone


is generally fibro-lamellar in nature;


because fibro-lamellar bone is formed


quickly, the bone fibrils, or filaments, are


laid down haphazardly. Consistent with


(10)  their rapid growth rate, warm-blooded


animals, such as birds and mammals,


tend to produce fibro-lamellar bone,


whereas reptiles, which are slowgrowing


and cold-blooded, generally


(15)  produce bone in which fibrils are laid


down parallel to each other. Moreover,


like the bone of birds and mammals,


dinosaur bone tends to be highly


vascularized, or filled with blood


(20)  vessels. These characteristics,


first recognized in the 1930’s,


were documented in the 1960’s by


de Ricqlès, who found highly vascularized,


fibro-lamellar bone in several


(25)  groups of dinosaurs. In the 1970’s,


Bakker cited these characteristics as


evidence for the warm-bloodedness of


dinosaurs. Although de Ricqlès urged


caution, arguing for an intermediate type


(30)  of dinosaur physiology, a generation of


paleontologists has come to believe


that dinosaur bone is mammalianlike.


In the 1980’s, however, Bakker’s


contention [z1] began to be questioned, as a


(35)  number of scientists found growth rings


in the bones of various dinosaurs that


are much like those in modern reptiles.


Bone growth in reptiles is periodic in


nature, producing a series of concentric


(40)  rings in the bone, not unlike the growth


rings of a tree. [z2] Recently, Chinsamy


investigated the bones of two dinosaurs


from the early Jurassic period


(208-187 million years ago), and found


(45)  that these bones also had growth rings;


however, they were also partially fibrolamellar


in nature. Chinsamy’s work


raises a question central to the debate


over dinosaur physiology: did dino-


(50)  saurs form fibro-lamellar bone because


of an innately high metabolic rate associated


with warm-bloodedness or


because of periods of unusually fast


growth that occurred under favorable


(55)  environmental conditions? (Although


modern reptiles generally do not form


fibro-lamellar bone, juvenile crocodiles


raised under optimal environmental


conditions do.) This question remains


(60)  unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence


into account, one cannot make


a definitive statement about dinosaur


physiology on the basis of dinosaur


bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an


(65) intermediate pattern of bone structure


because their physiology was neither


typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.









GWD-9-Q33:信息题


The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that the “caution” (line 29) urged by de Ricqlès regarding claims about dinosaur physiology was



A. unjustified by the evidence available to de Ricqlès


B. unnecessary, given the work done by Bakker and his followers


C. indicative of the prevailing scientific opinion at the time


D. warranted, given certain subsequent findings of other scientists


E. influential in the recent work of Chinsamy



問什麼答案是D呢?! de Ricqles這個人不是反駁Bakker的論點嗎?!  為何答案又說他warranted???

沙发
发表于 2006-1-10 13:51:00 | 只看该作者

最后一句有提到:


It may be that dinosaurs had an
(65) intermediate pattern of bone structure
because their physiology was neither
typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian


"intermediate pattern",这是作者说(同意)的.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-7 14:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部