GWD17-24-27 讨论讨论

MaccMichAA

以下是引用kathy8446在2006-9-8 12:43:00的发言：

感谢追逐梦想2006的翻译！

Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accommodated certain exceptions: the AFL had supported government intervention on behalf of injured workers and child laborers. AFL officials drew the line at national health insurance, however, partly out of concern for their own power. The fact that AFL outsiders such as the AALL had taken the most prominent advocacy roles antagonized Gompers. That this reform threatened union-sponsored benefit programs championed by Gompers made national health insurance even more objectionable.

第三段：AFL也有例外，AFL支持政府的干预，代表残疾工人和儿童工人。但是，AF关于全国健康保险部分处于对其权利的考虑。AFL的反对者AALL赞成G反对的roles。G支持union-sponsored工会保险，而全国健康保险的改革危害了其的利益，自然广受批判。

不过我对两处红色部分有点疑问。第一处out of their own power好像不是出于其自身权力的意思，不过我也不大明白应该怎么解释？第二处，好像应该是AALL极力反对AFL的G。（不过这句话的语法结构好怪啊）

有谁能帮忙解释一下？

偶觉得差不多红线就是这个意思

晴天小狗

模靠的时候就直接放弃了 猜了4个答案

当时完全看不懂〉。。

狂晕！

fpig

以下是引用kathy8446在2006-9-8 12:43:00的发言：

感谢追逐梦想2006的翻译！

Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accommodated certain exceptions: the AFL had supported government intervention on behalf of injured workers and child laborers. AFL officials drew the line at national health insurance, however, partly out of concern for their own power. The fact that AFL outsiders such as the AALL had taken the most prominent advocacy roles antagonized Gompers.
                That this reform threatened union-sponsored benefit programs championed by Gompers made national health insurance even more objectionable.

第三段：AFL也有例外，AFL支持政府的干预，代表残疾工人和儿童工人。但是，AF关于全国健康保险部分处于对其权利的考虑。AFL的反对者AALL赞成G反对的roles。G支持union-sponsored工会保险，而全国健康保险的改革危害了其的利益，自然广受批判。

不过我对两处红色部分有点疑问。第一处out of their own power好像不是出于其自身权力的意思，不过我也不大明白应该怎么解释？第二处，好像应该是AALL极力反对AFL的G。（不过这句话的语法结构好怪啊）

有谁能帮忙解释一下？

不明白 this reform 指的是什么，前面没有提到啊

小蓓

hsummer

写点什么,以飧后来之人...

我的理解,Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accom-

modated certain exceptions:  the AFL had

supported government intervention on behalf

 (45)      of injured workers and child laborers.  AFL

officials drew the line at national health

insurance, however, partly out of concern

for their own power.  The fact that AFL

outsiders such as the AALL had taken the

 (50)      most prominent advocacy roles antagonized

Gompers.  That this reform threatened union-

sponsored benefit programs championed by

Gompers made national health insurance

even more objectionable.

这一段的意思是,AFL的自愿捐助主义是有一些例外情况的,比如:他同意政府干预残疾工人和童工的生活.(注意,这与之前他说政府不应该干预工人的隐私是违背的).

AFL在NHI划定了界限,但是这有些越权了.事实上,AFL的反对者AALL有足够的理由反对G,因为G的这么风向一转去支持NHI就搬起石头砸了自己的脚.

总的来讲,一共有3派观点,labor activist(LA),AFL,和AALL.LA认为,这个医疗保险应该由政府来保证,因为这是工人的基本权利;但是这个观点和AFL相背,尽管AFL也是labor的一派,AFL认为呢,这个政府这么做是入侵了工人生活,并且NHI是一个对工人隐私违背.

G是AFL的头,他反对NHI的原因是,资本主义政府只是保护雇主(employer)的,而不是工人们,并且他害怕政府官僚主义入侵工人生活;并且医疗保险资金是部分来自雇主的,所以雇主就会用医疗检查,拒绝雇佣残疾工人.(G是保护工人的)

24题,A,

had positioned the AFL as

a leading opponent of the proposals for

 (25)  national health insurance that were advo-

cated beginning in 1915 by the American

Association for Labor Legislation (AALL),

25题,B

This

activism and the views underlying it came to

prevail in the United States labor movement

 (65)  and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed

its position on health legislation.

had positioned the AFL as

a leading opponent of the proposals for

 (25)  national health insurance that were advo-

cated beginning in 1915 by the American

Association for Labor Legislation (AALL),

25题,B

This

activism and the views underlying it came to

prevail in the United States labor movement

 (65)  and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed

its position on health legislation.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-2 13:20:22编辑过]

hsummer

26题,C

Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accom-

modated certain exceptions.

hsummer

27题,D

arising from the premise that

governments under capitalism invariably

     served employers’, not workers’, interests.

could permit companies to

    require employee medical examinations

 (40)  that might be used to discharge disabled

workers.

could permit companies to

    require employee medical examinations

 (40)  that might be used to discharge disabled

workers.

dongyintai

这篇文章看到第一眼就下了我一跳，第一篇没看懂……等整套卷子都过了，回来看第三遍后，终于做了题目，很可喜……还是对了一个，冤家啊，冤家

scarlett8327

感谢前辈们的指点。这个24题真的看得我晕死了，定位起来好不容易- -

至于hsummer的这句解释——“AFL在NHI划定了界限,但是这有些越权了.事实上,AFL的反对者AALL有足够的理由反对G,因为G的这么风向一转去支持NHI就搬起石头砸了自己的脚.”，我还是不理解。

我总觉得，AFL officials drew the line at NHI部分是出于对自身权利的考虑。因为像AALL这样的机构占了上风（take the most prominent advocacy roles），影响到了G这些领导人的地位。

而且仔细想想，most一词理应是个考点。

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/5 0:20:48编辑过]

winnemashi

写点什么,以飧后来之人...

我的理解,Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accom-

modated certain exceptions:  the AFL had

supported government intervention on behalf

(45)
     of injured workers and child laborers.  AFL

officials drew the line at national health

insurance, however, partly out of concern

for their own power.  The fact that AFL

outsiders such as the AALL had taken the

(50)      most prominent advocacy roles antagonized

Gompers.  That this reform threatened union-

sponsored benefit programs championed by

Gompers made national health insurance

even more objectionable.

这一段的意思是,AFL的自愿捐助主义是有一些例外情况的,比如:他同意政府干预残疾工人和童工的生活.(注意,这与之前他说政府不应该干预工人的隐私是违背的).

AFL在NHI划定了界限,但是这有些越权了.事实上,AFL的反对者AALL有足够的理由反对G,因为G的这么风向一转去支持NHI就搬起石头砸了自己的脚.
-                               -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------这理解错了吧！
总的来讲,一共有3派观点,labor activist(LA),AFL,和AALL.LA认为,这个医疗保险应该由政府来保证,因为这是工人的基本权利;但是这个观点和AFL相背,尽管AFL也是labor的一派,AFL认为呢,这个政府这么做是入侵了工人生活,并且NHI是一个对工人隐私违背.

G是AFL的头,他反对NHI的原因是,资本主义政府只是保护雇主(employer)的,而不是工人们,并且他害怕政府官僚主义入侵工人生活;并且医疗保险资金是部分来自雇主的,所以雇主就会用医疗检查,拒绝雇佣残疾工人.(G是保护工人的)
24题,A,had positioned the AFL asa leading opponent of the proposals for (25)
 national health insurance that were advo-cated beginning in 1915 by the AmericanAssociation for Labor Legislation (AALL),25题,BThisactivism and the views underlying it came toprevail in the United States labor movement (65)  and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversedits position on health legislation.

had positioned the AFL as
a leading opponent of the proposals for
(25)  national health insurance that were advo-
cated beginning in 1915 by the American
Association for Labor Legislation (AALL),
25题,B

This
activism and the views underlying it came to
prevail in the United States labor movement
(65)  and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed
its position on health legislation.

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-2 13:20:22编辑过]

-- by 会员 hsummer (2007/5/2 13:17:00)