ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1368|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-34,没有讨论过

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-25 15:43:00 | 只看该作者

OG-34,没有讨论过

34.


In 1985 state border colleges in Texas lost the enrollment of more than half, on average, of the Mexican nationals they had previously served each year. Teaching faculties have alleged that this extreme drop resulted from a rise in tuition for international and out-of-state students from $ 40 to $ 120 per credit hour.



Which of the following, if feasible, offers the best prospects for alleviating the problem of the drop in enrollment of Mexican nationals as the teaching faculties assessed it?



A. Providing grants-in-aid to Mexican nationals to study in Mexican universities.


B. Allowing Mexican nationals to study in Texas border colleges and to pay in-state tuition rates, which are the same as the previous international rate


答案是B,A为什么不对呢?OG的解释为


because the problem to be addressed is a drop in enrollment of Mexican nationals at Texas border colleges, providing financial incentive for Mexican nationals to study at Mexican universities, as A suggests, would offer no prospect of alleviating the problem.


可是我看不出什么问题啊

沙发
发表于 2005-11-25 19:54:00 | 只看该作者
因为Mexican U不属于state border colleges in Texas啊,给Mexican nationals钱让他们去别的大学上学并不能帮助Texas的这些学校提高入学率阿。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-26 00:04:00 | 只看该作者
嗯,谢谢清蒸鲈鱼了,是我没看清题目
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-4 08:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部