ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1064|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

这可就怪了

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-13 11:08:00 | 只看该作者

这可就怪了

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis. Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. Therefore, about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood.


19.   The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?


(A) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed.


(B) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, develop the disease themselves at any point.


(C) The estimate of the number of donors who would be disqualified by tests for NANB hepatitis is an underestimate.


(D) The incidence of NANB hepatitis is lower among the potential blood donors than it is in the population at large.A


(E) The donors who will still supply NANB-contaminated blood will donate blood at the average frequency for all donors.



答案先A,不解.

沙发
发表于 2005-11-13 11:30:00 | 只看该作者

A is the best choice.


If A is not valid, donors carrying NANB have other diseases for which reliable screening tests performed. Then these people are possibily disqualified because they are carrying other diseases. As a result, the number of these people who are still able to supply blood are less than 10% of donors.   

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-13 14:12:00 | 只看该作者
3ku 真 是郁闷,开始准备的时候没有想到逻辑会有这么难,一做管为东,才发现,逻辑是里面最难的了,郁闷之中。。。。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 10:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部