ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: E

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1390|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[请教]天山9-v2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-11 19:56:00 | 只看该作者

[请教]天山9-v2

Q2:
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to
ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and
unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by
growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?



A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints
and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew
processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in
Kernland off their land and into the cities.


为什么选E?我选C.我觉得E没有削弱原文啊?farmers到cities里去又不能reudce the urban unemployment.请教NN。

沙发
发表于 2005-11-11 21:04:00 | 只看该作者

Q2:
Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to
ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by
growing cashews
. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas,
removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?



A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints
and plastics.  不动摇cashew价格,不改变农民收入,对城镇就业未知 - 无关
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants. 于Kernland无关
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. 想说明什么?想说明即使去掉出口税对城镇就业不会有太大影响嘛?不确认?先放一边,看下面
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew
processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. 这就支持了不能取消出口税,不符合提问
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in
Kernland off their land and into the cities. 农民因为收成问题大量涌入城市,难道不会对城镇就业造成压力?可见不取消cashew出口税,the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment也不太可能实现;反之,如果取消出口税,由于种植cashew有较高经济受益,农民反而会回去种cashew,倒是能减轻城镇就业,所以,这个选项attack了题干的premise和conclusion,应该是最佳选项;至于C,似乎还欠缺一些.

板凳
发表于 2005-11-11 21:13:00 | 只看该作者

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=84264


哈哈,感觉我好强(其实在正规高强度考场里,可能3分钟才能读懂题干和选项呢);上面是刚刚去逻辑区搜索出来的以前的讨论,思路一致哈;逐梦网是个好地方!不过楼上的MM还是JJ要注意发言规则,这里是数学区,不要发语文的问题;只有我等乍来初到的不守规矩,东插一腿西插一脚搅版面的,请斑竹海涵哈~~~


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-11-11 21:14:23编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-27 17:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部