ChaseDream
设为首页收藏本站
账号登录 用户注册 
搜索
ChaseDream»Forum › GMAT考试 › GMAT逻辑专区 › GMAT-4-21请教求解思路（来自GWD小班课堂） ...
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 TN | OG (IMZC)

00:00:00

Editorial: The roof of Northtown Council's equipment-storage building collapsed under the weight of last week's heavy snowfall. The building was constructed recently and met local building-safety codes in every particular, except that the nails used for attaching roof supports to the building's columns were of a smaller size than the codes specify for this purpose. Clearly, this collapse exemplifies how even a single, apparently insignificant, departure from safety standards can have severe consequences.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the editorial's argument?

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

毕出-Helr

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2082|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GMAT-4-21请教求解思路（来自GWD小班课堂）

[复制链接]
sv2000
楼主
发表于 2005-11-11 13:49:00 | 只看该作者

GMAT-4-21请教求解思路（来自GWD小班课堂）



























Editorial:  The roof of Northtown Council’s equipment-storage building collapsed under the weight of last week’s heavy snowfall.  The building was constructed recently and met local building-safety codes in every particular, except that the nails used for attaching roof supports to the building’s columns were of a smaller size than the codes specify for this purpose.  Clearly, this collapse exemplifies how even a single, apparently insignificant, departure from safety standards can have severe consequences.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the editorial’s argument?










The only other buildings whose roofs collapsed from the weight of the snowfall were older buildings constructed according to less exacting standards than those in the safety codes.





Because of the particular location of the equipment-storage building, the weight of snow on its roof was greater than the maximum weight allowed for in the safety codes.





Because the equipment-storage building was not intended for human occupation, some safety-code provisions that would have applied to an office building did not apply to it.





The columns of the building were no stronger than the building-safety codes required for such a building.





Because the equipment-storage building was where the council kept snow-removal equipment, the building was almost completely empty when the roof collapsed.
回复

举报

yangsh
沙发
发表于 2005-11-11 14:16:00 | 只看该作者

B? not sure.


大雪把房子亚跨，房子建造符合标准，除钉子外。认为；小的违例会造成大灾难。


支持？[我的逻辑是：没有其他不合规定的建筑问题]


need NN help!!

回复

举报

carolhide
板凳
发表于 2005-12-11 17:04:00 | 只看该作者

B:因为equipment-storage building的特殊位置，屋顶上的积雪重于安全条例所允许的最大值。


这个不是削弱么，说明倒塌不是因为钉子，而是积雪过多。


my answer:A


请讨论！

回复

举报

irontiger
地板
发表于 2005-12-11 22:26:00 | 只看该作者

看了没感觉，题目似乎没有OG的标准。

回复

举报

yangxiaogang
5#
发表于 2005-12-11 23:47:00 | 只看该作者
支持A
回复

举报

chamcham
6#
发表于 2007-6-26 16:25:00 | 只看该作者
A: same cause, same effect. Support
回复

举报

返回列表 发新帖
高级模式
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

编辑器 2.0 编辑器 1.0
Mark一下！ 看一下！ 顶楼主！ 感谢分享！ 快速回复：

所属分类: GMAT考试

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 05:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部