|
偶反而觉得(D) 对就对在anatomical evidence(解剖学的证据), 首段的最后一句话是TS: But discoveries of the three-million-year-old fossil- ized remains of our hominid ancestor (10) Australopithecus have yielded sub- Stantial(结实的) anatomical(解剖学) evidence that upright walking Appeared prior to the dramatic enlargernent of the brain and the development of stone tools. 然后第二段是近一步分析这句话(即: 为什么这样说), 既然第二段否定了这样一个解释, 第三段是给出了直立行走的另一个解释. 我反而没有看出文章哪里有 chronological relationship.
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-16 10:36:09编辑过] |