ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: shellsnow
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教GWD 31-16

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-12-15 01:41:00 | 只看该作者

D根本上也是一个无关项目,文章已经提到fiber-optic telecommunications networks are constructed



B也是无关



只有E可以weaken,


12#
发表于 2005-12-18 11:45:00 | 只看该作者

B: Expanding its production of regenerators will require Light-line to spend proportionately more on labor and materials.


怎么不对了?正好反对


Light-line is one of the companies that will most benefit if new long-distance fiber-optic telecommunications networks are constructed.

13#
发表于 2005-12-23 08:29:00 | 只看该作者

I vote for D.


The conclusion is made based on the premise that since LL is a leading manufacturer of signal regenerators, the construction of long-distance telecommunications will benefit the company. There is an assumption that the construction of network must require using regenerators. If D is true, the assumption can’t hold any more. E is a trap. No matter how fast it is, it is still required of regenerators.

14#
发表于 2006-3-20 21:50:00 | 只看该作者

分析了很长时间,还是认为B是正确的答案


16: In recent years, networks of fiber-optic cable have been replacing electrical wire for transmitting telecommunications signals. Signals running through fiber-optic cables deteriorate, and so the signals must be run through a piece of equipment called a regenerator before being transmitted father. Light-Line is the leading manufacturer of signal regenerators. Therefore, Light-line is one of the companies that will most benefit if new long-distance fiber-optic telecommunications networks are constructed.


Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the prediction about light-ling’s prospects? 注意问是否能most benefit? 如果fiber-optic 网络constructed


A: Telecommunications signals sent along electrical wires can travel much farther than signals transmitted through fiber-optic before needing to be regenerated.


B: Expanding its production of regenerators will require Light-line to spend proportionately more on labor and materials. 【简而言之,就是说成本随着产品扩大,成比例提升,说明不一定benefit】


C: The volume of signals that a fiber-optic cable can carry is several thousand times greater than the volume that can be carried by an electrical wire of similar size.   【volume不是判断是否盈利的标准】


D: There are technologies that enable telecommunications signals to be transmitted without either wire or fiber-optic cable.【是否有其他技术不一定能削弱,还需要考虑其成本等因素】


E: Several manufacturers are developing regenerator technologies that will allow signals to be transmitted many times farther than at present before requiring regeneration. 【文中并没有说明signal能被transmitted farther就代表了其优势。文中只说这个signal 被传递farther就可行】



个人认为B是比较合理的削弱答案。


15#
发表于 2006-4-21 15:24:00 | 只看该作者
支持E!这道题就是针对long-distance telecommunications 而非其它 telecommunications !
16#
发表于 2006-6-6 19:38:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用追逐梦想2006在2006-3-20 21:50:00的发言:

分析了很长时间,还是认为B是正确的答案

16: In recent years, networks of fiber-optic cable have been replacing electrical wire for transmitting telecommunications signals. Signals running through fiber-optic cables deteriorate, and so the signals must be run through a piece of equipment called a regenerator before being transmitted father. Light-Line is the leading manufacturer of signal regenerators. Therefore, Light-line is one of the companies that will most benefit if new long-distance fiber-optic telecommunications networks are constructed.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the prediction about light-ling’s prospects? 注意问是否能most benefit? 如果fiber-optic 网络constructed

A: Telecommunications signals sent along electrical wires can travel much farther than signals transmitted through fiber-optic before needing to be regenerated.

B: Expanding its production of regenerators will require Light-line to spend proportionately more on labor and materials. 【简而言之,就是说成本随着产品扩大,成比例提升,说明不一定benefit】

C: The volume of signals that a fiber-optic cable can carry is several thousand times greater than the volume that can be carried by an electrical wire of similar size.   【volume不是判断是否盈利的标准】

D: There are technologies that enable telecommunications signals to be transmitted without either wire or fiber-optic cable.【是否有其他技术不一定能削弱,还需要考虑其成本等因素】

E: Several manufacturers are developing regenerator technologies that will allow signals to be transmitted many times farther than at present before requiring regeneration. 【文中并没有说明signal能被transmitted farther就代表了其优势。文中只说这个signal 被传递farther就可行】

个人认为B是比较合理的削弱答案。

同意b
17#
发表于 2006-6-6 23:31:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用追逐梦想2006在2006-3-20 21:50:00的发言:

分析了很长时间,还是认为B是正确的答案

16: In recent years, networks of fiber-optic cable have been replacing electrical wire for transmitting telecommunications signals. Signals running through fiber-optic cables deteriorate, and so the signals must be run through a piece of equipment called a regenerator before being transmitted father. Light-Line is the leading manufacturer of signal regenerators. Therefore, Light-line is one of the companies that will most benefit if new long-distance fiber-optic telecommunications networks are constructed.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the prediction about light-ling’s prospects? 注意问是否能most benefit? 如果fiber-optic 网络constructed

A: Telecommunications signals sent along electrical wires can travel much farther than signals transmitted through fiber-optic before needing to be regenerated.

B: Expanding its production of regenerators will require Light-line to spend proportionately more on labor and materials. 【简而言之,就是说成本随着产品扩大,成比例提升,说明不一定benefit】

C: The volume of signals that a fiber-optic cable can carry is several thousand times greater than the volume that can be carried by an electrical wire of similar size.   【volume不是判断是否盈利的标准】

D: There are technologies that enable telecommunications signals to be transmitted without either wire or fiber-optic cable.【是否有其他技术不一定能削弱,还需要考虑其成本等因素】

E: Several manufacturers are developing regenerator technologies that will allow signals to be transmitted many times farther than at present before requiring regeneration. 【文中并没有说明signal能被transmitted farther就代表了其优势。文中只说这个signal 被传递farther就可行】

个人认为B是比较合理的削弱答案。


我原本也是选E的,但是看了上面的解释,觉得B计较合理
18#
发表于 2006-6-7 06:12:00 | 只看该作者

I think D is not the best answer, because even though there is tech. but it may not be used.

E is wrong, because they might still need the product.

so D is a better choice.

19#
发表于 2006-6-7 06:14:00 | 只看该作者
B is also wrong because every expanding definately needs more costs, so it is not a strong point.
20#
发表于 2006-7-20 21:48:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用tiandaochouqin在2006-6-7 6:14:00的发言:
B is also wrong because every expanding definately needs more costs, so it is not a strong point.

支持,而且更重要的是题目没有说要扩展的阿!!

支持E

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 01:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部