【求助】CR难题300里的一道

Barbara-Lei

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better. Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT: * **A.** Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States. * **B.** Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers. * **C.** Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market * **D.** Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe. * **E.** States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents. **正确答案：**D 其他选项都理解，但是D我认为算是他因削弱？求NN 来解释一下这个选项~

aveline01

印象很深，当时这题刷题时候也错了。
不过后来的思考是：

为了削弱 argument 'adopt more stringent standards for safety belt'，那么就需要证明 safety belt 并不是美国比欧洲发生更多严重事故的主要原因
👉 1235 都能够在一定程度上说明这一点，因此可以造成削弱；
👉 相比之下，D只是说明了在数据层面美国的确容易比欧洲发生严重事故，与argument 的证明无关

lz 参考一下