ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1558|回复: 3

[排名] 2024金融时报全球MBA排名 (Financial Times Global MBA Ranking 2024)

[复制链接]
发表于 2024-2-12 20:10:48 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

2024 年 2 月 12 日,英国《金融时报》(Financial Times,以下简称“FT”)发布了 2024 MBA 百强排行榜,即刻为大家揭晓排名结果。附件中的 PDF 包含了排名各项指标的得分。

更详细的排名各项指标的得分,请下载附件 PDF。

Rank
2024
Rank
2023
3 Yr
Avg.
School Name Country
1 - - University of Pennsylvania: Wharton US
2 2 2 Insead France
3 1 2 Columbia Business School US
3 6 7 SDA Bocconi School of Management Italy
5 3 6 IESE Business School Spain
6 - 7 Northwestern University, Kellogg School of Management US
6 11 9 MIT: Sloan US
8 16 11 London Business School UK
9 8 11 Cornell University: Johnson US
10 11 9 University of Chicago: Booth US
11 4 6 Harvard Business School US
12 17 13 HEC Paris France
12 15 15 Dartmouth College: Tuck US
14 - 15 Duke University's Fuqua School of Business US
15 10 11 Yale School of Management US
16 17 18 University of Virginia: Darden US
17 30 27 Esade Business School Spain
18 14 19 UCLA Anderson School of Management US
19 7 13 University of California at Berkeley: Haas US
20 22 27 IE Business School Spain
21 19 18 New York University: Stern US
21 20 19 Ceibs China
23 4 11 Stanford Graduate School of Business US
24 - - Shanghai University of Finance and Economics: College of Business China
25 27 35 ESCP Business School France
26 28 28 University of Oxford: Saïd UK
27 25 24 National University of Singapore Business School Singapore
27 48 36 Fudan University School of Management China
29 23 25 University of Cambridge: Judge UK
30 - 31 University of Washington: Michael G. Foster US
31 39 34 Indian School of Business India
32 38 36 Nanyang Business School, NTU Singapore Singapore
33 21 26 University of Southern California: Marshall US
33 49 35 Carnegie Mellon: Tepper US
35 42 38 HKUST Business School Hong Kong
36 - 32 IMD — International Institute for Management Development Switzerland
37 - - Peking University: Guanghua China
38 32 32 Georgetown University: McDonough US
39 37 37 Imperial College Business School UK
40 61 60 University of Georgia: Terry US
41 51 51 Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad India
42 29 39 Rice University: Jones US
42 36 41 Emory University: Goizueta US
44 50 47 University of Texas at Austin: McCombs US
45 41 48 HKU Business School Hong Kong
46 46 45 Alliance Manchester Business School UK
47 52 51 Indian Institute of Management Bangalore India
48 35 40 University of North Carolina: Kenan-Flagler US
49 31 36 Washington University: Olin US
49 64 56 Georgia Tech Scheller College of Business US
51 54 51 University of California at Irvine: Merage US
51 43 - Michigan State University: Broad US
53 53 60 Arizona State University: WP Carey US
54 70 63 Essec Business School France
55 - 49 University of Rochester: Simon Business School US
55 59 65 University of Texas at Dallas: Jindal US
57 47 59 Edhec Business School France
57 76 74 EMLyon Business School France
59 71 61 University of Notre Dame: Mendoza US
60 55 57 Warwick Business School UK
61 63 70 Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Netherlands
62 71 77 Queen's University: Smith Canada
63 68 68 WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management Germany
63 - - University of Sydney Business School Australia
65 59 67 University of St Gallen Switzerland
66 87 - Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Business School Ireland
67 76 70 Indian Institute of Management Calcutta India
68 - 68 Bayes Business School (formerly Cass) UK
69 58 65 George Washington University US
70 67 72 University of Toronto: Rotman Canada
71 74 80 Texas A & M University: Mays US
72 61 61 Singapore Management University: Lee Kong Chian Singapore
73 56 67 Mannheim Business School Germany
74 85 - The Lisbon MBA Catolica | Nova Portugal
75 64 63 CUHK Business School Hong Kong
76 81 84 William & Mary: Mason US
77 86 - Audencia France
78 78 84 Durham University Business School UK
79 95 91 AGSM at UNSW Business School Australia
80 88 - Cranfield School of Management UK
81 - - Wisconsin School of Business US
82 75 73 Boston University Questrom School of Business US
83 83 85 McGill University: Desautels Canada
84 92 86 Brigham Young University: Marriott US
85 90 - Indian Institute of Management Lucknow India
86 95 82 Babson College: Olin US
86 - - Hult International Business School US
86 - - Rutgers Business School US
89 82 79 Sungkyunkwan University GSB South Korea
90 84 89 Western University: Ivey Canada
91 94 - University College Dublin: Smurfit Ireland
92 - - University of Edinburgh Business School UK
93 78 - Northeastern University: D'Amore-McKim US
94 100 - Eada Business School Barcelona Spain
95 - - Copenhagen Business School (CBS) Denmark
96 - - Grenoble Ecole de Management France
97 - - Politecnico di Milano School of Management Italy
98 90 - Tias Business School, Tilburg University Netherlands
99 - - XLRI — Xavier School of Management India
100 - - Fordham University: Gabelli US

Table Notes

Footnotes: * KPMG reported on the results of obtaining evidence and applying specified audit procedures relating to selected survey data provided for the Financial Times 2022 MBA ranking for selected business schools. Enquiries about the assurance process can be made by contacting Lori Huber of KPMG at lahuber@kpmg.ca. The specified audit procedures were carried out between October and November 2021. The audit date published denotes the survey for which the specified audit procedures were conducted.

† No data available from the school for this category

‡ School has no board

** Data in this column are for information only and are not used in the rankings.

Some 157 points separate the top programme, at University of Pennsylvania: Wharton, from the school ranked 100. The schools are divided into four tiers. Business schools in tiers l and ll score above the average for the cohort, and tiers lll and lV are below it. The difference in scores between schools ranked consecutively is greater within tiers l and lV than in tiers ll and lll. Tier l includes eight schools from Wharton to London Business School. Tier ll includes schools from Cornell University: Johnson, ranked nine, to Alliance Manchester Business School at 46. Tier lll, headed by Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, spans schools ranked 47 to Western University: Ivey at 90. Tier lV includes schools from University College Dublin: Smurfit at 91 to Fordham University: Gabelli at 100.

Download the full ranking as a PDF

游客,如果您要查看本帖隐藏内容请回复

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
 楼主| 发表于 2024-2-22 11:33:01 | 显示全部楼层

排名方法

Global MBA Ranking 2024: methodology

This Financial Times Global MBA ranking features 100 of the world’s top full-time MBA programmes. A total of 132 schools took part in the ranking process for the 2024 edition. All participating schools meet the FT’s entry criteria and are accredited by Equis or the AACSB.

The FT surveys alumni three years after completing their MBA. For schools to enter the ranking calculation process, the FT requires that a minimum of 20 per cent of alumni reply to the survey, with at least 20 fully completed surveys.

We surveyed MBA alumni who completed their MBA in 2020. Due to the disruption from Covid in that year, the FT considered schools with a lower response rate. A total of 6,330 alumni from the class of 2020 completed our survey — an overall response rate of 32 per cent.

The ranking is derived from 21 criteria.

Alumni responses inform eight criteria that together contribute 56 per cent of its weight. Twelve criteria are calculated from school data, accounting for 34 per cent of the ranking (KPMG also audits several schools every year). The remaining criterion, the research rank, counts for 10 per cent.

Alumni-informed criteria are based on the data collected over three years. Responses from the 2024 ranking survey carry 50 per cent of the total weight and those from 2023 and 2022, 25 per cent each. If only two years of data are available, the weighting is split 60:40 if data is from 2024 and 2023, or 70:30 if it is from 2024 and 2022. For salary figures, the weighting is 50:50 for two years’ data.

The first two alumni criteria are average income three years after completion and salary increase from before the MBA to now, each weighted at 16 per cent. For the latter, half of the weight applies to the absolute increase and half to the percentage rise (the published figure). Current salaries are converted to US dollars using IMF international purchasing power parity rates.

The highest and lowest salaries are removed from each school, to calculate a normalised average. Finally, salaries are weighted to reflect differences between different sectors.

“Value for money” for each school is calculated by dividing its average alumni salary three years after completion by the MBA’s total cost, including tuition, lost salary, opportunity cost and other expenses. Any scholarship assistance given to alumni is subtracted from the total.

The FT also collects information from schools on their current faculty, newly enrolled students and the latest completing class. School criteria include the diversity of staff, board members and students by gender and citizenship. For gender criteria, schools with a 50:50 composition score highest.

Another diversity measure is the student sector category, which looks at the range of industries in which candidates have worked before starting their MBA.

We also measure the effectiveness of alumni networks based on ratings given by graduates for helping with various tasks such as finding careers advice, internships, job opportunities and recruiting staff.

The research rank is based on the number of articles by full-time faculty in 50 internationally recognised academic and practitioner journals. The rank combines the number of publications from January 2021 to July 2023, weighted relative to faculty size.

There are some changes to the methodology this year.

The environmental, social and governance (ESG) rank is based on the proportion of teaching hours from core courses dedicated to ESG topics and time spent on instructing how organisations can reach net zero. Now, it additionally includes the alumni evaluation of their school’s ESG teaching.

Finally, the school’s carbon footprint rank now awards credit to schools with a carbon emissions audit report that includes Scope 3 emissions (those not controlled by the school but which occur externally in its value chain as a result of its activities).

The MBA ranking is a relative listing. Schools are ranked against each other by calculating a Z-score for each criterion. The Z-score is a statistic that shows where a score lies in relation to the mean. These scores are then weighted as outlined in the ranking key and added together for a final score.

After removing schools that did not meet the response rate threshold from the alumni survey, a first version is calculated. The school at the bottom is removed and a second version is calculated and so on until we reach the top 100. The top 100 schools are ranked accordingly to produce the final list.

Key (weights for ranking criteria are shown in brackets as a percentage)

Salary today**: average alumni salary three years after completion, US$ PPP equivalent (international purchasing power parity, see methodology above). This figure is not used in the ranking. #

Weighted salary (16): average alumni salary three years after completion, US$ PPP equivalent, with adjustment for variations between sectors. #

Salary increase (16): average difference in alumni salary from before the MBA to now. Half of this figure is calculated according to the absolute salary increase and half according to the percentage increase relative to pre-MBA salary. #

Value for money rank (5): calculated using salary today, course length, tuition and other costs, including income forgone during the MBA. #

Career progress rank (3): calculated according to changes in the level of seniority and the size of the organisation alumni work in now, compared with before their MBA. #

Aims achieved (4): the extent to which alumni fulfilled their stated goals or reasons for studying for an MBA. #

Alumni network rank (4): effectiveness of the alumni network for career opportunities, starting companies, gaining new ideas, recruiting staff and providing event information (eg career-related talks), as rated by alumni. #

Careers service rank (3): effectiveness of the school careers service for career counselling, personal development, networking events, internship search and recruitment, as rated by alumni. #

Employed at three months (2): percentage of the most recent completing class that found employment or accepted a job offer within three months of completing their studies. The figure in brackets is the percentage of the class for which the business school was able to provide employment data and is used to calculate its final score. §

Sector diversity rank (3): calculated according to the diversity of sectors in which the students worked at the time of admission, before the MBA.

Female faculty (3): percentage of female faculty.

Female students (3): percentage of female students on the MBA.

Women on board (1): percentage of female members on the school’s advisory board.

International faculty (3): calculated according to the diversity of faculty by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from their location of employment — the figure published in the table.

International students (3): calculated according to the diversity of current MBA students by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from the location in which they study — the figure in the table.

International board (1): percentage of the board whose citizenship differs from the location in which the school is based.

International mobility rank (5): based on alumni citizenship and the locations where they worked before their MBA, on completion and three years after. #

International course experience rank (3): calculated according to whether the most recent completing class carried out exchanges and internships, lasting at least a month, in countries other than where the school is based. In-person, virtual and hybrid experiences are included. §

Faculty with doctorates (5): percentage of full-time faculty with a doctoral degree.

FT research rank (10): calculated according to the number of articles published by current full-time faculty members in 50 selected academic and practitioner journals from January 2021 to July 2023. The rank combines the absolute number of publications with the number weighted relative to the faculty’s size.

Carbon footprint rank (4): calculated using the net zero target year for carbon emissions set by the university and/or school, and the existence of a publicly available carbon emissions audit report since 2019. Extra credit is given to schools with an audit report that includes Scope 3 emissions (those not controlled directly by the school but which occur externally in its value chain as a result of its activities).

ESG and net zero teaching rank (3): proportion of teaching hours from core courses dedicated to environmental, social and governance issues and climate solutions for how organisations can reach net zero. Alumni evaluation of their school’s ESG teaching is also included.

Overall satisfaction**: average evaluation by alumni of the course, scored out of 10. After alumni answered various questions about their MBA experience, they were asked to rate their overall satisfaction, on a 10-point scale. This figure is not used in the ranking. (** Category not used in the ranking.)

Footnotes

Schools with a 50:50 (male/female) composition receive the highest possible score in the three gender-related criteria.

§ Alumni who completed their MBA between July 2022 and June 2023.

# Includes data for the class of 2020 and one or two preceding classes where available.

发表于 2024-6-7 01:01:52 | 显示全部楼层
感谢分享!
发表于 2024-9-1 17:31:08 | 显示全部楼层
看一下!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:


近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-8 11:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部