返回列表 发新帖
查看: 8607|回复: 37

[排名] 2023金融时报全球MBA排名 (Financial Times Global MBA Ranking 2023)

[精华] [复制链接]
发表于 2023-2-13 04:39:41 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

2023 年 2 月 13 日,英国《金融时报》(Financial Times,以下简称“FT”)发布了 2023 MBA 百强排行榜,即刻为大家揭晓排名结果。附件中的 PDF 包含了排名各项指标的得分。

更详细的排名各项指标的得分,请下载附件 Excel 文件:

3 Yr
School Name Country
1 2 - Columbia Business School US
2 3 2 Insead FR/SG
3 10 6 Iese Business School Spain
4 3 - Harvard Business School US
4 6 - Stanford Graduate School of Business US
6 13 10 SDA Bocconi School of Management Italy
7 14 - University of California at Berkeley: Haas US
8 17 13 Cornell University: Johnson US
9 5 7 Northwestern University: Kellogg US
10 9 8 Yale School of Management US
11 7 7 University of Chicago: Booth US
11 19 13 Duke University: Fuqua US
11 11 - MIT: Sloan US
14 26 - UCLA Anderson School of Management US
15 18 14 Dartmouth College: Tuck US
16 8 9 London Business School UK
17 11 12 HEC Paris France
17 20 16 University of Virginia: Darden US
19 14 15 New York University: Stern US
20 16 14 Ceibs China
21 25 23 University of Southern California: Marshall US
22 40 34 IE Business School Spain
23 22 20 University of Cambridge: Judge UK
23 - - Shanghai University of Finance and Economics China
25 21 20 National University of Singapore Business School Singapore
26 24 24 University of Michigan: Ross US
27 52 - ESCP Business School FR/IT/ES/UK/DE
28 31 25 University of Oxford: Saïd UK
29 47 36 Rice University: Jones US
30 34 28 Esade Business School Spain
31 29 28 Washington University: Olin US
32 27 25 Georgetown University: McDonough US
32 28 26 International Institute for Management Development (IMD) Switzerland
32 30 30 University of Washington: Michael G Foster US
35 38 33 University of North Carolina: Kenan-Flagler US
36 45 44 Emory University: Goizueta US
37 34 38 Imperial College Business School UK
38 39 38 Nanyang Business School, NTU Singapore Singapore
39 32 31 Indian School of Business India
40 43 41 University of Florida: Warrington US
41 59 43 HKU Business School China
42 36 33 HKUST Business School China
43 - - Michigan State University: Broad US
44 41 39 Vanderbilt University: Owen US
45 48 51 University of Rochester: Simon US
46 43 40 Alliance Manchester Business School UK
47 73 65 Edhec Business School France
48 32 37 Fudan University School of Management China
49 23 33 Carnegie Mellon: Tepper US
50 46 45 University of Texas at Austin: McCombs US
51 62 54 Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad India
52 53 47 Indian Institute of Management Bangalore India
53 75 62 Arizona State University: WP Carey US
54 49 48 University of California at Irvine: Merage US
55 57 48 Warwick Business School UK
56 72 62 Mannheim Business School Germany
57 85 65 University of Maryland: Smith US
58 69 65 George Washington University US
59 76 66 University of St Gallen Switzerland
59 81 71 University of Texas at Dallas: Jindal US
61 51 57 Singapore Management University: Lee Kong Chian Singapore
61 80 76 University of Georgia: Terry US
63 86 71 Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Netherlands
64 50 54 CUHK Business School China
64 55 60 Georgia Tech Scheller College of Business US
66 69 65 City, University of London: Bayes (formerly Cass) UK
67 79 74 University of Toronto: Rotman Canada
68 74 65 WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management Germany
69 - - University of Massachusetts Amherst: Isenberg US
70 64 72 Essec Business School FR/SG
71 54 65 University of Notre Dame: Mendoza US
71 99 90 Queen's University: Smith Canada
73 76 68 Boston College: Carroll US
74 96 85 Texas A & M University: Mays US
75 63 63 Boston University Questrom School of Business US
76 68 63 Indian Institute of Management Calcutta India
76 89 85 EMLyon Business School France
78 82 79 University of Pittsburgh: Katz US
78 95 82 Durham University Business School UK
78 - - Northeastern University: D'Amore-McKim US
81 94 88 William & Mary: Mason US
82 65 61 Sungkyunkwan University GSB South Korea
83 90 88 McGill University: Desautels Canada
84 92 91 Western University: Ivey Canada
85 - - The Lisbon MBA Catolica | Nova Portugal
86 - - Audencia France
87 - - Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Business School Ireland
88 - - Cranfield School of Management UK
89 - - Indian Institute of Management Indore India
90 - - Indian Institute of Management Lucknow India
90 - - Tias Business School, Tilburg University Netherlands
92 82 82 Brigham Young University: Marriott US
93 - - Vlerick Business School Belgium
94 - - University College Dublin: Smurfit Ireland
95 65 69 Babson College: Olin US
95 98 91 AGSM at UNSW Business School Australia
97 - - Birmingham Business School UK
98 - - Frankfurt School of Finance and Management Germany
99 - - University of California at Davis US
100 - - Eada Business School Barcelona Spain

Table Notes

Footnotes: * KPMG reported on the results of obtaining evidence and applying specified audit procedures relating to selected survey data provided for the Financial Times MBA ranking for selected business schools. Enquiries about the assurance process can be made by contacting Lori Huber of KPMG at The specified audit procedures were carried out between October and November 2022. The audit date published denotes the survey for which the specified audit precedures were conducted.

** Data in this column are for information only and are not used in the rankings.

‡ No school advisory board data available.

‡‡ No citizenship data available.

Please note the Covid pandemic has limited global travel which has an impact on the international course experience rank.

Some 154 points separate the top programme, at Columbia, from the school ranked 100. The schools are divided into four tiers. Business schools in tiers l and ll score above the average for the cohort, and tiers lll and lV are below it. The difference in scores between schools ranked consecutively is greater within tiers l and lV than in tiers ll and lll. Tier l includes 18 schools from Columbia to Virginia's Darden. Tier ll includes schools from New York's Stern, ranked 19, to Edhec at 47. Tier lll, headed by Fudan, spans schools ranked 48 to 81. Tier lV includes schools from Sungkyunkwan at 82 to Eada at 100.

Download the full ranking as a Excel



您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

 楼主| 发表于 2023-2-13 09:39:54 | 显示全部楼层

Global MBA Ranking 2023: methodology update and entry criteria


This year’s Global MBA Ranking includes some important changes. The aim is to retain a focus on outcomes, while placing more emphasis on tracking how the education offered reflects diversity and sustainability — and ultimately fosters greater societal impact by business.

Outcome measures still account for more than half of the total weighting. Salary levels, three years after completion, and wage increases, from before the MBA to now, remain central. But the weighting of salary criteria is reduced from 40 per cent to 32 per cent to give greater emphasis to other factors. Value for money — a proxy for social mobility, which takes into account study costs, financial aid and earnings post MBA — has been increased to a weighting of 5 per cent.

The ability to speak languages other than English at graduation has been dropped as a ranking criterion. So has alumni recommendations of other business schools, while their assessments of the value of school networks — a key aspect of an MBA — receives a 4 per cent weighting. Other outcome measures — employment at three months after completion, the quality of the career service, and alumni career progress — remain.

Global MBA Ranking 2023

View the ranking here. Register for the February 22 Spotlight on MBA online event, and read the MBA report

The weightings for gender parity and international diversity of students and faculty are equally weighted at 3 per cent — as is a new measure of the diversity of employment backgrounds of students. Since many choose to stay in the country where they studied, the weight for international mobility has been reduced.

New emphasis has been given to the environment. Fresh credit is given for schools providing a recent public carbon emissions report complying with international standards, and also for setting near-term zero emission targets. Only foreign study visits and placements lasting at least one month are counted towards the international course experience rank, to penalise shorter-term international travel.

The updated methodology
This FT MBA ranking features 100 of the world’s best full-time MBA programmes. A total of 142 schools took part in the ranking process for the 2023 edition. All participating schools meet the FT’s entry criteria and are accredited by Equis or the AACSB.

The FT surveys alumni three years after completing their MBA. For schools to enter the ranking calculations, the FT usually requires that a minimum of 20 per cent of alumni reply to the survey, with at least 20 fully completed surveys.

This year, because of disruption from Covid, the FT considered schools with a lower response rate. A total of 7,134 alumni from the class of 2019 completed our survey — an overall response rate of 36 per cent.

The ranking has 21 categories. Alumni responses inform eight criteria that together contribute 56 per cent of its weight. Twelve criteria are calculated from school data, accounting for 34 per cent of the ranking. KPMG audits a number of schools every year. The remaining criterion, the research rank, counts for 10 per cent.

Alumni-informed criteria are based on the data collected over three years. Responses from the 2023 ranking survey carry 50 per cent of total weight and those from 2022 and 2021, 25 per cent each. If only two years of data are available, the weighting is split 60:40 if data are from 2023 and 2022, or 70:30 if they are from 2023 and 2021. For salary figures, the weighting is 50:50 for two years’ data.

The first two alumni criteria are average income three years after completion and salary increase from before the MBA to now, each weighted at 16 per cent. For the latter, half of the weight applies to the absolute increase and half to the percentage rise (published). Current salaries are converted to US dollars using IMF international purchasing power parity rates.

The highest and lowest salaries are removed from each school, to calculate a normalised average. Finally, salaries are weighted to reflect differences between different sectors.

“Value for money” for each school is calculated by dividing its average alumni salary three years after completion by the MBA’s total cost, including tuition, lost salary, opportunity cost and other expenses. Any scholarship assistance given to alumni is subtracted from the total.

The FT also collects information from schools on their current faculty, newly enrolled students and the latest completing class. School criteria include the diversity of staff, board members and students by gender, citizenship and the MBA’s international reach. For gender criteria, schools with a 50:50 composition score highest.

The research rank is based on the number of articles by full-time faculty in 50 internationally recognised academic and practitioner journals. The rank combines the number of publications from January 2020 to July 2022, with the number weighted relative to faculty size.

For the 2023 ranking, we have made some changes in response to feedback from schools. For example, the total weighting for alumni salaries is now 32 per cent, not 40.

The environmental, social and governance rank is based on the proportion of teaching hours from core courses including ESG topics, but now includes time spent on instructing how organisations can reach net zero.

There are three new categories. One measures the quality of alumni networks. The second is student sector diversity, which looks at the range of employment sectors candidates have worked in before starting their MBA. Finally, we added a school carbon footprint rank.

We removed two categories: first, the number of languages required on graduation, excluding English; second, alumni recommendations of schools other than their own from which they would recruit MBA graduates.

The MBA ranking is a relative listing. Schools are ranked against each other by calculating a Z-score for each criterion. The Z-score is a statistic that shows where a score lies in relation to the mean. These scores are then weighted as outlined in the ranking key and added together for a final score.

After removing schools that did not meet the response rate threshold from the alumni survey, a first version is calculated. The school at the bottom is removed and a second version is calculated and so on until we reach the top 100. The top 100 schools are ranked accordingly to produce the final list.

Key (weights for ranking criteria are shown in brackets as a percentage)
Salary today**: average alumni salary three years after completion, US$ PPP equivalent. This figure is not used in the ranking. #

Weighted salary (16): average alumni salary three years after completion, US$ PPP equivalent (see methodology below), with adjustment for variations between sectors. #

Salary increase (16): average difference in alumni salary from before the MBA to now. Half of this figure is calculated according to the absolute salary increase and half according to the percentage increase relative to pre-MBA salary. #

Value for money (5): calculated using salary today, course length, tuition and other costs, including lost income during the MBA. #

Career progress (3): calculated according to changes in the level of seniority and the size of the organisation alumni work in now, compared with before their MBA. #

Aims achieved (4): the extent to which alumni fulfilled their stated goals or reasons for doing an MBA. #

Alumni network rank (4): effectiveness of the alumni network for career opportunities, starting companies, gaining new ideas, recruiting staff and giving event information (such as career-related talks), as rated by alumni.

Careers service (3): effectiveness of the school careers service for career counselling, personal development, networking events, internship search and recruitment, as rated by alumni. #

Employed at three months (2): percentage of the most recent completing class which found employment or accepted a job offer within three months of completing their studies. The figure in brackets is the percentage of the class for which the school was able to provide employment data and is used to calculate the school’s final score. §

Sector diversity rank (3): calculated according to the diversity of sectors the students worked in at the time of admission, before the MBA.

Female faculty (3): percentage of female faculty.

Female students (3): percentage of female students on the MBA.

Women on board (1): percentage of female members on the school’s advisory board.

International faculty (3): calculated according to the diversity of faculty by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from their location of employment — the figure published in the table.

International students (3): calculated according to the diversity of current MBA students by citizenship and the percentage whose citizenship differs from the location in which they study — the figure in the table.

International board (1): percentage of the board whose citizenship differs from the location in which the school is based.

International mobility (5): based on alumni citizenship and the locations where they worked before their MBA, on completion and three years after. #

International course experience (3): calculated according to whether the most recent completing class carried out exchanges and internships, lasting at least a month, in countries other than where the school is based. In-person, virtual and hybrid experiences are included. Due to travel restrictions caused by the pandemic, ranks for this category may not be a true reflection of the overseas opportunities that schools can offer. Prospective students should contact business schools to check if they offer study trips and internships abroad. §

Faculty with doctorates (5): percentage of full-time faculty with a doctoral degree.

FT research rank (10): calculated according to the number of articles published by current full-time faculty members in 50 selected academic and practitioner journals between January 2020 and July 2022. The FT50 rank combines the absolute number of publications with the number weighted relative to the faculty’s size.

Carbon footprint rank (4): calculated using the net zero target year for carbon emissions set by the university or school, and a publicly available carbon emissions audit report within the last three years.

ESG and net zero teaching rank (3): proportion of teaching hours from core courses including ethics, social, environmental issues and climate solutions that can enable organisations to reach net zero.

Overall satisfaction**: average evaluation by alumni of the course, scored out of 10. After alumni answered various questions about their MBA experience, they were asked to rate their overall satisfaction, on a 10-point scale. This figure is not used in the ranking.

发表于 2023-2-13 13:04:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2023-2-13 13:32:35 | 显示全部楼层
新的排名出来了呀 HAAS好高
发表于 2023-2-13 14:02:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2023-2-15 18:06:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2023-2-15 18:06:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2023-2-15 19:16:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2023-2-16 11:02:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2023-2-19 10:36:15 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:


正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-24 21:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 All Rights Reserved.