揽瓜阁逻辑做题小分队 第41天

EowynXXX

ab
1.政府因为用来化雪的主要化学物质短期警告潜在的travel disruption。有替代物质但是对环境有害，所以需要豁免才能用。如果政府启用豁免权就能避免travel disruption
a.替代物质足量
b.今年冬天的风雪跟往年一样
c.政府有豁免相关的政策
d.原先用的那种化学物质往年都够用
e.如果真的发生了disruption，不是由于原先那种物质短缺造成的
2.经济衰退的Y区发现了天然气，F公司来打井开采。接着当地水源受污染，F的开采可能是部分原因；但是几乎没居民投诉水质。
why
a.当地降水有浮动
b.没有专家判断水里到底有没有toxic物质
c.F来开采复苏经济受到社区的强烈支持
d.Y的居民水费很贵
e.天然气40年内会开采完

cynthiage123

Mark一下！               

祎气呵陈

1:  Option C - "Fonidol was attracted to Region Y as part of a local economic-development effort that attracted extremely strong support throughout the community," would most help to explain why the residents did not complain to the authorities. This could suggest that residents were willing to tolerate the murkiness in their water because they supported the gas extraction project and recognized its economic benefits to their underprivileged region.

2: The answer says B, but I also approve C

1: Option B - "No expert advice has been obtained on behalf of any of the residents to determine whether the water contains toxic substances," could explain why residents didn't complain if they weren't aware that the murkiness could be hazardous. However, Option C - "Fonidol was attracted to Region Y as part of a local economic-development effort that attracted extremely strong support throughout the community," could also explain why residents didn't complain, as they may have prioritized the economic benefits over the water quality. Both answers could potentially explain the residents' lack of complaints, but it depends on the specifics of the situation and what the question is aiming to highlight.

祎气呵陈

而且题干中还专门提了 economically depressed，C出于经济利益考虑就很适合啊

jk123123

Q1:

A. There will be a sufficient amount of the alternative chemicals to supply ALL the airports that need them
Conclusion: So if the government issued such exemptions to COLD-WEATHER airports, travelers would not have to face the warned-of travel disruptions.

The conclusion doesn't assume all airports. That means if airports do not suffer from cold weather, it is fine that they do not have sufficient chemicals because there will be no disruption.

Ratikainen

第二题第一句看到这个economically depressed就知道应该选C。GMAT不会无缘无故给你个Modifier在这里强调这个地区很穷。B的解释实在太牵强。都已经是Murky了还需要专家来确定没有毒？Common Sense一想就知道居民是应为经济利益驱使所以才不会抱怨。选C非常合理。