- UID
- 1465432
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2020-8-23
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
板凳
楼主 |
发表于 2021-1-19 15:37:39
|
只看该作者
20210119 第二次打卡
【听力】
时间:精听+分析 一共42分钟,生词已加入单词本背诵
这篇口音比较重,听了三遍才完整听懂
漏听/没听出来的词:
comes before 这里comes弱读了,重音在后面的before上,导致漏听
syllable 音节(生词)
realize 口音太重了没听清。。
then we looked at whether 连读,口音重,没听清
brain plasticity brain是口音重没听清,后面plasticity(生词)
文章大意:
讲述对于学习语言能力的看法,及大脑和其他感知器官是如何帮助人类进行语言学习的
【阅读】
读文章用时4分钟,分析用时32分钟
- Main Idea
- LAW was one of the main determinants of women’s experiences in colonial America.
- limited women's autonomy and power.
- Exception
- But the specific legal and cultural rules →set boundaries in varied among different regions.
- It mattered if a woman lived in a colony controlled by a common law system (as in England) or a civil law system (such as that of Spain).
- Standpoint(evaluation 1)
- Yet civil law systems far more protective (women’s property) than the common law system.
- This may not seem to fit the common perception of Spanish law and culture as being particularly patriarchal, And it may not seem consistent with the perception of English law
- Standpoint(evaluation 2)
- Nevertheless, women gained tangible benefits from civil law systems (that they did not enjoy under common law.)
- When a husband died, a woman can continue to control the Bienes parafernales; she also gained full control of the dowry and the arras
- When a man died, his widow continued to control the Bienes parafernales; she also gained full control of the dowry and the arras as well as receiving half of the community property
文章大致对比了两种法案下女性的权益,最终作者更偏向civil law
要按gmat出题套路就会问
1,问主旨:讨论/介绍两种法案下女性权益的不同
2,问细节,遗产继承例子的作用:附征女性在civil law下权益更好
2,问细节,第二段举例的作用:说明当时社会对女性地位的歧视(当时人们不认为女性该有平等权益)
句子:
And it may not seem consistent with the perception of English law as being more individualistic than Continental European legal systems.
出现了as being这种在gmat里非常容易误判错的收发,这里的being是形容女性处于一种xx条件下的生活
引申在gmat里,如果being常见跟过去完成时或后面不是状态而是一般进行时动作,那就都是错的
|
|