求助逻辑中的解释题

dooooooooit

我想问下这种解释题怎么做啊？ Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 percent the government-provided pensions paid to Runagians over 65. The aim of the increase was to stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country, where most pension recipients live. Statistics, however, show that there has been no increase in economic activity in those regions since then, but that there has been noticeably more spending in the urban areas. Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase resulted in the unintended state of affairs described? A Until the pensions were increased, many Runagians over 65 in rural regions had been receiving support from their children who live in urban areas. B The pensions were increased when the number of people below the poverty level in rural areas of Runagia reached an all-time high. C City-dwellers in Runagia rarely travel to rural regions of the country. D The Runagian postal system is so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks for pension checks to reach recipients in rural areas. E On average, the pensions were higher in rural than in urban areas before the increase. 我当时错选了E，看答案后发现A的确有道理，但是不会过度推理么？ 文中并没有说子女会把钱用于城市中的消费，那么也就不能解释urban city的经济增长。 总感觉这种解释题gap有点大，即使我想到了（然而我一般想不到），我也不敢选。 求NN指教~~~ （或者有什么解释题的总结帖吗~我在CD上没看到

长丝弓

关于此题，GMATLA是这样分析的哈：

情景：由于担心老年人的经济情况，Runagia国政府决定给所有65岁以上的公民增加20%的养老金。这个方案的目标是刺激农村的经济，这是因为农村是大部分这些公民居住的地方。但是，农村的经济行为并没有增加，反而城市的经济行为增加了很多。

推理：推理文段最后要求我们解释的其实是一个“目标”。由于在前提中出现了方案，因此，本题是方案推理，推理结构为：
目标：To stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country
方案：The government of Runagia decided two years ago to increase by 20 percent the government-provided pension paid to all Runagians over 65

选题方式：方案推理有三个评估方向，简而言之，即，答案选项一定和方案的内容相关。

选项分析：

A选项：Correct. 直到养老金上升，很多在农村居住的65岁以上老人都会从在城市居住的孩子那里得到支援。本选项提及到了方案，如果老人们以前从孩子那里得到钱，现在没有钱了（注意原文中的时态），那么本选项显然不能达成目标，因为老人的钱并没有变多，自然促进不了经济。

B选项：养老金上涨的时候是Runagian贫穷率最高的时候。贫穷率是否高都不会影响人们多得钱使得自己的经济状况变好。

C选项：Runagian的城市居民很少到农村去。本选项没有提到方案。

D选项：Runagian的银行太没有效率了以至于老人们需要花3周的时间才能得到钱。无论要花都少时间，只要能给，应该就可以让经济条件变好。

E选项：平均来说，在养老金上涨以前，农村的养老金比城市的养老金高。不论哪里的养老金高，都没有提到涨养老金这件事情，所以本选项不能评估方案推理。

dooooooooit

长丝弓 发表于 2020-9-24 18:45
关于此题，GMATLA是这样分析的哈：

情景：由于担心老年人的经济情况，Runagia国政府决定给所有65岁以上的 ...

“一定和方案内容有关”，学到了，谢谢NN!

长丝弓

dooooooooit 发表于 2020-9-25 10:52
“一定和方案内容有关”，学到了，谢谢NN!

有收获就好。不是我哦，是GMATLA的大牛分析的。

dooooooooit

我又来了 这道题有异曲同工之妙  也是一道解释题，我的想法也差不多。。。
Denoma, a major consumer-electronics maker, had a sizable decline in sales revenue for its most recent fiscal year. This result appears surprising, because electronics retailers report that although their overall sales were considerably lower than in the previous year, their sales revenue from Denoma models actually grew, largely thanks to some innovative and popular models that Denoma introduced.

Which of the following, if true, does most to explain the apparently surprising result?

A  Because of the need to educate the public about its new models’ capabilities, Denoma’s advertising spending was higher than normal over the period.
B  For the period at issue, Denoma’s major competitors reported declines in revenue that were, in percentage terms, greater than Denoma’s.
C A significant proportion of Denoma’s revenue comes from making components for other consumer-electronics manufacturers.
D Unlike some of its major competitors, Denoma has no lines of business outside consumer electronics to provide revenue when retail sales of consumer electronics are weak.
E During the period, consumer-electronics retailers sold remaining units of Denoma’s superseded models at prices that were deeply discounted from those models’ original prices.

答案是C。我错选了A，（这是没搞清楚revenue和profit对吗？）
我的疑问：没说来自making components for other consumer-electronics manufacturers这部分收入减少啊？那就不能解释为什么D的revenue减少啊！
看了刚发的这篇帖子，我觉得我犯了同样的错误，再遇到类似的题可能又会错，思路问题症结在哪儿啊？怎么解决啊？

长丝弓

说要选和方案内容有关的，可是我应用不起来是怎么回事。。555

dooooooooit

顶一下