ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1566|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求问一逻辑题,感谢!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2019-9-16 19:42:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
38. Amphibian populations are declining in numbers worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth’s ozone layer has been continuously depleted throughout the last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously produced by the sun, and which can damage genes. Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to shield them, they are particularly vulnerable to UV-B radiation. In addition, their gelatinous eggs lack the protection of leathery or hard shells. Thus, the primary cause of the declining amphibian population is the depletion of the ozone layer.
Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument EXCEPT:
(A) Of the various types of radiation blocked by atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type that can damage genes.
(B) Amphibian populations are declining far more rapidly than are the populations of nonamphibian species whose tissues and eggs have more natural protection from UV-B.
(C) Atmospheric ozone has been significantly depleted above all the areas of the world in which amphibian populations are declining.
(D) The natural habitat of amphibians has not become smaller over the past century.
(E) Amphibian populations have declined continuously for the last 50 years.





我理解全文只有最后一句话是结论,所以我选A 答案选D
D 不是典型的排除他因吗怎么就不算加强了,求问
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2019-9-23 20:02:17 | 只看该作者
up 其他题目都差不多懂了,就这题还是不会
板凳
发表于 2019-12-3 05:45:09 | 只看该作者
D中的natural habitat的大小变化与population有关吗?无关啊,既然无关,就更谈不上加强还是削弱了啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-27 09:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部