ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3273|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 914北美场的小狗

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2019-9-15 07:50:22 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
脑子坏掉了才会一战裸考 走之前管理员阿姨问我成绩确认了吗我说取消了她对我来一句那期待再见到你 。。
中的狗不多但是也有用所以来回报攒人品了

输血
1. ds
b1 b2 b3 b4...每个数都是前一个数+5 问b99+1能否被10整除 b后面都是角标
条件1 b1=-1
条件2 b100+1能被5整除

2. ds
能否得出m>n
条件1 m/n>1
条件2 (m-n)/n>(m-n)/m

3. ps
250个人回答两个问题,yes/no/no opinion,
第一个问题回答no的有100个人,第二个问题回答no的有140个人,两个问题都回答no的是60个人,问exactly 只answer一个no的有多少人,我选了120

4.jj里关于交集并集的ds题,确定条件1是交集选A

5ps 标准差
问比10 20 30 40 50的标准差大的是哪个选项
有-10 -5 0 5 10和20 45 60 75 80这种选项 选项的数字不一定对但是确定间隔是对的 (不知道有没有解释明白不懂的话告诉我 我再努力解释一下)我选的是与中间值差20/15得那个选项

月度
碰到连着两篇巨长的文章想死的心都有了 月度废加上已经没有耐心读下去了所以不是很靠谱!希望关键词能帮到考古!

1.美国的桥,经常repair,水泥做的或者steel做的桥在不同州(northern states, northeast southeast)坏的几率不同 水泥的几率比较平均但是steel就vary 还有第一段出现de-icing compound吧如果我文章没记混的话
第一个问题细节题标黄de-icing compound问作用
后来还有个问题问如果compound这个是factor的话那么应该出现的现象是哪个,第一段最后很好找了定位有however和southeast啥的但是要反一下

2. guardianship 只中了这一个 但是问题好像有点不太一样就是罗马法那个 我好像没看到useless有关的选项 我的问题大概是before15世纪与那个k啥的law不一样的是罗马法啥作用之类的……是指内容而不是有无作用 也有最后一大段标黄和问作者态度的这种

3.
是讲稀缺性带来的影响 说人都觉得自己感知价值的能力比别人强(有题,但是我不确定我理解的对不对),然后就有一些不同的声音观点讲到底是哪种理论,
还有道题是说怎么办演唱会才会financial上利润最大化,选项有什么曾经火现在过气的明星大量票,小众明星大场馆大量票blabla 还有啥样明星少量票的 构筑追星所以对这道题印象贼深刻
关键词scarcity demand这种
(补充 楼下考古考到了 跟那个构筑做的一定是同一篇 文章是改写的但是内容类似的

坐稳
咖啡店明确feedback page在顾客easy find的地方,这个月卖出去3w杯可是feedback只有100+complain和60+suggestion,于是这个Customer service就跟CEO讲没什么可改进的地方大家都觉得挺好


别的想起来再补充吧






收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2019-9-15 09:14:34 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
又想起来一个ds
等腰直角三角形面积是S 周长是T 有个矩形面积也是S
求S
条件1. T=S
条件2. 长方形的其中一个短边是4
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2019-9-15 09:21:50 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
想到一个罗技
airline上有电话服务 付费那种 但是事实上因为手机普及所以电话服务可有可无 但是airline无所谓因为设备是电话公司的反正意思就是他们就算不赚什么钱也没什么损失 然后问这段话depend 选项有equipment重量会不会加重fuel负担之类的
地板
发表于 2019-9-15 10:13:18 | 只看该作者
谢谢分享
5#
发表于 2019-9-15 14:40:19 发自 iPad 设备 | 只看该作者
数学第一题A?求第三题解法。等腰直角那题是A?
6#
发表于 2019-9-15 14:54:49 | 只看该作者
是原文吗?

JOURNAL ARTICLE
Explaining the Impact of Scarcity Appeals in Advertising: The Mediating Role of Perceptions of Susceptibility
Martin Eisend
Journal of Advertising
Vol. 37, No. 3 (Fall, 2008), pp. 33-40
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20460853
Page Count: 8

Abstract
Scarcity appeals in advertising enhance value perception, which in turn impacts purchase intentions. This study suggests that the impact of perceived value on purchase intention is mediated by consumers' perceptions of personal susceptibility and the susceptibility of others. Results of an experimental study support a mediating effect where enhanced value perception leads to increases in perceived influence on self relative to others, and therefore enhances purchase intention. The results confirm the impact of perceptual biases as suggested by the "third-person effect," thus providing some interesting theoretical contributions for advertising research as well as for managerial implications.

是说scarcity和消费者purchasing decision之间的关系。context是 TV 广告 (作者全文说的product scarcity不是actual,只是个perceived scarcity, 比如广告说,“buy soon, almost gone, only few left!”)。P1给了个generalized overview,说scarcity怎么影响decision to buy。作者解释说一部分的原因是人们都觉的自己对产品的估价能力都比较高 (作者没有否认这点,好像是用来establish为什么tv ads比较effective,忘记了但没考到,主要的在P1后)。

Products that have limited availability can induce consumers to evaluate those products more favorably. As valuable products (such as tickets for concerts of famous artists) are often scarce, consumers infer that those products are valuable  (Jung and Kellaris 2004). Scarcity effects on value perception have revealed broad empirical support (Lynn 1991). Marketers make frequent use of this effect and base promotional claims on the principle of scarcity, using phrases like "limit one per customer," "limited release," "only while supplies last," or  "limited time only." Over the past few years, it has also become  a popular practice in home-shopping television to count down  the number of products to indicate that "supplies are dwindling fast." In this study, it is assumed that scarcity appeals  in mass media advertising lead to a direct effect on perceived value and purchase intention, as well as an additional effect that is based on perceptions of susceptibility. Those perceptions  result from the so-called third-person effect. The perceptions mediate the impact of value perception for scarcity appeals and can contribute to increased purchase intention. This study suggests that people take into consideration the perceived influence on self and the perceived influence on others; the  impact of value perception increases with higher perceived influence on self relative to others.

P2作者接着说perception of scarcity给不同consumer type带来的不同的效果。这里作者提到两种consumers群:individualism和collectivism。作者解释这两个区别。individualism这群prefer scarcity with low demand,因为他们追求的是产品的uniqueness 。相反,collectivism里的人追求的是产品的popularity, 所以他们prefer的是scarcity with high demand。当一个scarce product从low demand到high demand,individualism这群就不要它了。这两区别是主要的考点:需要 infer from 和 apply to examples。阅读不难,原文找不到,但应该不重要。。。individualists就像一开始在还很稀少的时候买lv包包的人。但当很多人都有lv包包时候,他们就不喜欢了。collectivists就是买iphone的,多么popular/in high demand,他们买的就更多。

The question arises as to what happens whenitems that are less desirable (due to wide availability) are advertised. Value perceptionshould be lower and lead to perception of lower personal susceptibility, but toincreased susceptibility of others. This, in turn, can strengthen the belief that the offer does not providea unique value, which means that purchase intentions  may decrease. There may be moderatingvariables that can lead to other conclusions, however. One main issue may bethe cause for scarcity. Although this study was investigating the case ofscarcity dependent on limited supply, scarcity can also  result from high demand. In such a case, the perceived valuemay be lower since it would not contribute to satisfying one's need for uniqueness. Thisresult may also depend on cultural differences, however, as the need foruniqueness can differ for individualisticand collectivisticcultures. While individualistic cultures may have a high need for uniqueness,scarcity may serve as a means to distinguish oneself from others and  foster higher perceived value in cases where scarcity isbased on limited supply. For collectivists, however, the perceived valuemay increase when scarcity is based on high demand, as  it indicates high popularity, and thepossession of such items would contribute to the feeling of being part of agroup. In  turn, the perceived influenceon others may also have different impacts. High perceived influence on othersrelative to self for  items that arescarce because of high demand would strengthen  the need to be part of a group, but it wouldweaken the possible contribution to uniqueness. On the other hand, if items  are scarce because of limited supply, theyenhance uniqueness, particularly for individualistic cultures. Future researchshould  focus on such variables thatmediate or moderate the described  scarcity effects that possibly play a role forthe investigated perceptions of susceptibility. Besides the cause of scarcity  and the impact of culture on need for uniqueness,further  variables can be considered asmoderators or mediators, such  asindividual variables (e.g, self-esteem or the confidence in one's ability toresist influence attempts, age, and education of recipients) or the wayhypothetical others are defined in terms of social distance.

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
7#
发表于 2019-9-15 16:11:47 | 只看该作者
感谢楼主!想请教一下第三题,怎么算出来的120?谢谢
8#
发表于 2019-9-15 16:13:32 | 只看该作者
吠喔呐 发表于 2019-9-15 14:40
数学第一题A?求第三题解法。等腰直角那题是A?

第一题,条件1比较容易,知道首项和差,可以求出b99+1=98*5 可以整除;条件2 我的想法是:b100+1=5k, b100=b99+5=5k-1, b99=5k-6, b99+1=5k-5, 所以不确定能否被10整除,不充分。 你看看我这样想对吗
9#
发表于 2019-9-15 16:17:26 | 只看该作者
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN
March 1993
Volume 268, Issue 3

Why America’s Bridges Are Crumbling
Inadequate maintenance has piled up a repair bill that will take decades to pay off. Indeed, the scope of the problem is only now becoming clear

by Kenneth F. Dunker and Basile G. Rabbat


本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2019-9-15 16:54:37 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者

(100-60)+(140-60)
120是五个选项里最大的数字 我觉得比较确定
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 03:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部