ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1476|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD9-35

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-25 12:37:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD9-35

Scientists studying the physiology



of dinosaurs have long debated whether



dinosaurs were warm- or cold-blooded.



Line Those who suspect they were warm-



(5) blooded point out that dinosaur bone



is generally fibro-lamellar in nature;



because fibro-lamellar bone is formed



quickly, the bone fibrils, or filaments, are



laid down haphazardly. Consistent with



(10) their rapid growth rate, warm-blooded



animals, such as birds and mammals,



tend to produce fibro-lamellar bone,



whereas reptiles, which are slowgrowing


and cold-blooded, generally



(15) produce bone in which fibrils are laid



down parallel to each other. Moreover,



like the bone of birds and mammals,



dinosaur bone tends to be highly



vascularized, or filled with blood



(20) vessels. These characteristics,



first recognized in the 1930’s,



were documented in the 1960’s by



de Ricqlès, who found highly vascularized,



fibro-lamellar bone in several



(25) groups of dinosaurs. In the 1970’s,



Bakker cited these characteristics as



evidence for the warm-bloodedness of



dinosaurs. Although de Ricqlès urged



caution, arguing for an intermediate type



(30) of dinosaur physiology, a generation of



paleontologists has come to believe



that dinosaur bone is mammalianlike.



In the 1980’s, however, Bakker’s




contention began to be questioned, as a



(35) number of scientists found growth rings



in the bones of various dinosaurs that



are much like those in modern reptiles.



Bone growth in reptiles is periodic in



nature, producing a series of concentric



(40) rings in the bone, not unlike the growth



rings of a tree. Recently, Chinsamy



investigated the bones of two dinosaurs



from the early Jurassic period



(208-187 million years ago), and found



(45) that these bones also had growth rings;



however, they were also partially fibrolamellar



in nature. Chinsamy’s work



raises a question central to the debate



over dinosaur physiology: did dino-



(50) saurs form fibro-lamellar bone because



of an innately high metabolic rate associated



with warm-bloodedness or



because of periods of unusually fast



growth that occurred under favorable


(55) environmental conditions? (Although



modern reptiles generally do not form



fibro-lamellar bone, juvenile crocodiles



raised under optimal environmental



conditions do.) This question remains



(60) unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence



into account, one cannot make



a definitive statement about dinosaur



physiology on the basis of dinosaur



bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an


(65) intermediate pattern of bone structure



because their physiology was neither



typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.


Q35:


According to the passage, the discovery of growth rings in the bones of certain dinosaurs served to undermine which of the following claims?


A. That modern reptiles are related to dinosaurs


B. That bone growth in dinosaurs was periodic in nature


C. That dinosaurs were warm-blooded


D. That dinosaurs had an intermediate type of physiology


E. That fibro-lamellar bone is the product of a rapid growth rate


Why not E?


As far as I am concerned, D is more specific than C.


Confused

沙发
发表于 2008-10-13 09:55:00 | 只看该作者

Chinsamy’s work raises a question central to the debate over dinosaur physiology: did dinosaurs form fibro-lamellar bone

是否恐龙form fibro-lamellar bone,争论不在于E中所提到的,That fibro-lamellar bone is the product of a rapid growth rate(此话在第一段中已经证明是正确的)

文章主要围绕warm-blooded,所以就算是细节题作答的时候也要围绕中心词,呵呵,个人意见。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-23 20:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部