请教GWD-6-20

jamesyeah

Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five.  Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.

Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.

The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.

Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.

Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.

答案如何选择D,D怎么感觉是支持呢？

jamesyeah

up

dewsue

有帮家伙原来就存的长期存款，现在政府搞个什么鬼政策吸引存款——当然有好处嘛，对这帮家伙。所以他们就刷的一下把钱又取出来转存到鬼政策下的存款类别了，政府看着哎哟：我的政策好吧，你们看，这个政策下的存款类别的存款多了。其实，狗屁，银行吸引的还是那么储蓄。没钱的老百姓政策再好也没钱存。

jamesyeah

明白了，谢谢！