to monica,其实我做那篇时那道题也错掉了,还是那句话,我越复习RC越发现句子间的逻辑关系比单词和难句都重要(当然这两项是基础),诀窍不敢说,我现在也在摸着石头过河,只是谈一下我自己做阅读的感受,我分析主要是用画逻辑简图和研究OG解释,这样下来一篇要分半个钟以上,但觉得值,从不断的画逻辑简图中可以适应GMAT文章脉络,做题也比刚开始乱摸乱撞差不多,这也是参见了很多NN的前车之鉴~~monica可以试试,第二次对答案时读文章就顺着逻辑去读,感觉一下如果你是作者你会怎样说~~呵呵,不过这个过程比较慢哦,所以我现在半天才能分析四篇,把量给降了下来:(
In recent years, teachers of introductory courses in Asian American studies have been facing a dilemma nonexistent a few decades ago, when hardly any texts in that field were available. Today, excellent anthologies and other introductory texts exist, and books on individual Asian American nationality groups and on general issues important for Asian Americans are published almost weekly.
呵呵,我只是在做OG,这篇我还没做过,所以不敢在那里乱发言,帮你看了一下,单从句子结构上说,a few decades ago 是修饰 a dilemma nonexistent的~后面的when从句是说明a few decades ago 的,似乎和Today形成对比?