ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1282|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD-6-14, GWD-6-16

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-8 23:10:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD-6-14, GWD-6-16



Pls help me answer the two questions, I cannot understand why

Q14:




Political Advertisement:







Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the
jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.  Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs
created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been
higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took
office.  So there can be no question that
throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting
steadily bigger.







Which of the following, if true, most
strengthens the argument in the advertisement?








  • The
         average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was
         higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor
         Delmont’s tenure.
  • Average
         pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
  • Some of
         the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the
         meantime been eliminated again.
  • The
         average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure
         has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
  • The
         average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs
         in the suburbs surrounding the city.




  •    Answer:




    Q16:




    Historian:
    Newton
    developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern
    calculus.  Leibniz developed closely
    analogous concepts and techniques.  It
    has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent.  Researchers have, however, recently
    discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics.  Several scholars have argued that since the
    book includes a presentation of Newton’s
    calculus concepts and techniques, and since
    the notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and
    techniques
    , it is virtually certain that the traditional view is
    false.  A more cautious conclusion than
    this is called for, however.  Leibniz’ notes are limited to early
    sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede
    the ones in which Newton’s
    calculus concepts and techniques are presented.







    In the historian’s reasoning, the two
    boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?








  • The first
         provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian
         defends; the second is evidence that has been used to support an opposing
         position.
  • The first
         provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian
         defends; the second is that position.
  • The first
         provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn
         to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends;
         the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.
  • The first
         is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian
         criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian’s
         own position.
  • The first
         is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian
         criticizes; the second is further information that substantiates that
         evidence.










  • 您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 11:46
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部