ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes can become contaminated with bacteria that cause pneumonia and strep throat. They found that contamination usually Occurs after toothbrushes have been used for four weeks. For that reason, people should replace their toothbrushes at least once a month.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3331|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 93

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-6 00:53:00 | 只看该作者

OG 93

请教:



93. Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes can become contaminated wth bacterial that cause pneumonia and strep throat. They found that contamination usually occurs after toothbrushes have been used for four weeks. For that reason, people should replace their toothbrushes at least once a month.



Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?


(A) The dental researchers could not discover why toothbrush contamination usually occurred only after toothbrushes had been used for four weeks.


(B) The dental researchers failed to investigate contamination of toothbrushes by viruses, yeasts, and other pathogenic microorganisms.


(C) The dental researchers found that among people who used toothbrushes contaminated with bacterial that cause pneumonia and strep throat, the incidence of these diseases was no higher than among people who used uncontaminated toothbrushes.


(D) The dental researchers found that people who rinsed their toothbrushes thoroughly in hot water after each use were as likely to have contaminated toothbrushes as were people who only rinsed their toothbrushes hurriedly in cold water after each use.


(E) The dental researchers found that, after six weeks of use, greater length of use of a toothbrush did not correlate with a higher number of bacterial being present. C



E为什么不对?

沙发
发表于 2005-9-6 11:12:00 | 只看该作者
6个星期是4个星期以后,即便是 did not correlate with a higher number of bacterial being present 也不能说明在4个星期的时候没有很多的contamination, 不能weak研究人员的说法
板凳
发表于 2005-12-16 18:30:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用寂寞的声音在2005-9-6 11:12:00的发言:
6个星期是4个星期以后,即便是 did not correlate with a higher number of bacterial being present 也不能说明在4个星期的时候没有很多的contamination, 不能weak研究人员的说法


说的对,是无关的。


不过我也选成E了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 10:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部