Q11~Q14: TTGWD4-Q3 to Q6: Extensiveresearch has shown that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales arethemselves short-term. Companies’ hopesthat promotions might have a positive aftereffect have not been borne out forreasons that researchers have been able to identify. A price promotion entices only a brand’s long-termor “loyal” customers; people seldom buy an unfamiliar brand merely because theprice is reduced. They simply avoidpaying more than they have to when one of their customary brands is temporarilyavailable at a reduced price. A pricepromotion does not increase the number of long-term customers of a brand, as itattracts virtually no new customers in the first place. Nor do price promotionshave lingering aftereffects for a brand, even negative ones such as damage to abrand’s reputation or erosion of customer loyalty, as is often feared. So why docompanies spend so much on price promotions? Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise therewould be more of them. And the bigger theincrease in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss. While short-term price promotions can havelegitimate uses, such as reducing excess inventory, it is the recognizableincrease in sales that is their main attraction to management, which istherefore reluctant to abandon this strategy despite its effect on the bottom line. Q13: The passage suggests that evidence for pricepromotions’ “effect on the bottom line” (line 40) is provided by A. the lack of lingering aftereffects fromprice promotions [url=]B. the frequency with which pricepromotions occur[/url] C. price promotions’ inability to attract newcustomers D. price promotions’ recognizable effect onsales E. the legitimate uses to which management canput price promotions
为什么答案是B?
|