ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2180|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 9.21放狗,虽然分手失败,还是回馈G友

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-9-22 14:32:46 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
刚刚考完一脸懵逼。。。趁还没忘赶紧码字下来~~~~
Quantitative:
1. 考了很多函数图像的题,有一道是一个g(x)和f(x)图像在坐标系里面都是0-10区间的但是图像都是大于0的,然后g(x)在f(x)上面,问h(x)>0? 然后两个条件,一个条件是h(x)定义h(x)=g(x)-f(x),第二个条件是h(x)在0-5范围内比g(x)小。具体条件可能有偏差,不过两个条件都是大于0的,所以D。
2. 有一道是JJ里的题,关于买卖的。说一个owner可以买进5个lots,或者卖出2个lots,但是买进卖出算一次transection,问一共14个lots最少有多少次transections?我看到的题和JJ上的不一样,估计是变体!所以这题就是3次,买进卖出3次是9个lots,再买进一次就是14个,但是最后一次不算是一个transection。所以答案是3 times

其余的数学题我实在是没啥印象了,好好分析都不难。

Verbal:

SC超级多agreement和modifier的题,同位语和宾语从句也蛮多的,好好看就行,大致都不难可以秒选。

CR中遇到了一个很诡异的题,似乎是这样

The company rolled out the survey - " The company is responsible for the employee rights of pre-exisiting sick and non-presription drugs" Yes or No. 题干差不多是这样,问你这个survey的问题在哪?选项有:
The company used historical records to predict the results.
The employees are foced to fill in the form, because the emolyees mentioned in the survey cannot represent the employee rights.
The company increases healthcare costs
其余几个选项记不住了,我选的employee的那个,其实是question survey本身,没有data respresentative的问题,但是employee被默认成了全部。

还有一道题是说又一个low-fat dairy food要扩大生意准备进军X和Y两个地方,然后发现说XY两个地方的人都有肥胖的症状,同时还有个什么H effects,such as ... (两个病),然而最后这个company只进军了X没进军Y,问你为啥?有一个选项蛮明显的,说是Y这个地方根据meal traditional habits,dairy food consumption在Y特别低。


RC中遇到了一篇新的文章,超级难理解,我大致回忆一下,说是一个地方(具体忘了啥地方了)的farmers一直question女性裁缝的影响,认为说他们强多了大量的training practices。然后non-guilt和guilt farmers之间的rights也有一定的问题(具体rights忘了。。。)。然后说这中有一个era是blind era,这个era加剧了对于女性裁缝的偏见,但是政府在中间是有在调和他们对于女性裁缝的偏见。但是即使这样还是没能改变他们的看法。这些女性裁缝觉得他们的view不应该这样,我们也应有自己应该有的权利,包括我们也可以制作men clothing,但是没卵用。举个例子,男性裁缝就可以做女性clothing。最后一段就是拓展开来,没记住了~ 楼主在的考场有点冷,然后中间break上了厕所被吹的还是想尿尿!正好还是这篇文章更吓尿了!!!还是挺恶心的一篇,大家认真读!

还有一篇阅读蛮简单的,说是despite high price existing in many store, however, the recent studies showed that consumers will still choose high price of products because they are not willing to consider the price as primary factors, but brand image as the priorties. 第一段大致是这样,然后第二段提供了3个explanations为啥消费者这么选择商品。一个题是第一段高亮问作用,我选了outline the phenomenon to introduce explainations,然后问主旨啥的,全文没有argue/against,所以选了explainations的选项。因为楼主做marketing,所以这篇文章2分钟做完了。。。

祝大家好运!我还要继续刷。。。



收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-9-22 14:44:50 | 只看该作者
感谢!!!
板凳
发表于 2017-9-22 14:47:28 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2017-9-22 15:14:54 | 只看该作者
楼主考傻了~是9.22!!!
5#
发表于 2017-9-22 15:17:08 | 只看该作者
請問樓主說得裁縫那篇是類似這篇嗎?
雖然好像內容不太一樣...In 1675, Louis XIV established the Parisian seamstresses' guild, the first Line independent all-female guild created in over 200 years. Guild members could make and sell women's and children's clothing, but were prohibited from producing men's clothing or dresses for court women. Tailors resented the ascension of seamstresses to guild status; seamstresses, meanwhile, were impatient with the remaining restrictions on their right to clothe women.
The conflict between the guilds was not purely economic, however. A 1675 police report indicated that since so many seamstresses were already working illegally, the tailors were unlikely to suffer additional economic damage because of the seamstresses' incorporation.
Moreover, guild membership held very different meanings for tailors and seamstresses. To the tailors, their status as guild members overlapped with their role as heads of household, and entitled them to employ as seamstresses female family members who did not marry outside the trade. The seamstresses, however,
viewed guild membership as a mark of independence from the patriarchal family. Their guild was composed not of family units but of individual women who enjoyed unusual legal and economic privileges.
At the conflict's center was the issue of whether tailors' female relatives should be identified as family members protected by the tailors' guild or as individuals under the jurisdiction of the seamstresses' guild.
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2017-9-22 15:20:03 | 只看该作者
xx50824 发表于 2017-9-22 15:17
請問樓主說得裁縫那篇是類似這篇嗎?
雖然好像內容不太一樣...In 1675, Louis XIV established the Parisia ...

还是不太一样。。。
7#
发表于 2017-9-23 20:16:54 | 只看该作者
顶楼主!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 15:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部