【逻辑】0914邏輯寂靜整理 (9/24 23:20 更新至#59+補充5）

ai559031

Liangll 发表于 2017-9-21 11:08
逻辑君想问问这一题
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wi ...

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill- conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
(B) The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
(C) The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
(D) The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument's advocacy of a particular strategy.
(E) The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
OA.D


先來理解句子作用：
第一句是在講一個goal,但是That plan is ill- conceived,被作者反對-->刪ABCE
特別注意: 並不是goal被反駁, 而是plan本身被反對(plan is ill- conceived);
作者對於這個goal沒有表態,只有對plan表態
所以就只剩下D了


你說的為什麼是advocacy:
這要看到最後：And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms
所以第二句粗體是在支持說為什麼要more sensible preservation strategy




大概是這樣～
我其實不太會解釋bold face題
不確定我解釋的有沒有清楚

蛋卷黄

感谢分享！               

Liangll

ai559031 发表于 2017-9-21 15:13
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area fro ...

啊谢谢你 所以这里说的particular strategy 是指文章后面出现的那一个啊
明白了！感恩

超q小企鹅妈妈

逻辑君，想问下35题，为什么不选
【除了这个人没有其他人看到这个珍稀动物】

ai559031

超q小企鹅妈妈 发表于 2017-9-21 17:04
逻辑君，想问下35题，为什么不选
【除了这个人没有其他人看到这个珍稀动物】
...

我的想法是：這不能代表這個人看到的是錯的

如果是說沒有資料顯示這種動物有遷徙跡象, 則可以反駁

老實說我這題當初看了很久
也沒有找到考古
所以光從狗主給的資訊, 我覺得狗主的答案更能削弱結論

不過我認為題目資訊應該不只有這樣而已
應該有其他資訊可以讓我們迅速排除其他選項才對

Jessieeel

逻辑君辛苦啦！！！能否麻烦你帮忙分析下第一题版本二的思路呢。谢谢啦！

ai559031

Jessieeel 发表于 2017-9-21 20:05
逻辑君辛苦啦！！！能否麻烦你帮忙分析下第一题版本二的思路呢。谢谢啦！ ...

其實我覺得版本二即使結論變成“下次訪談要用電話”
思路還是我上面寫的那樣
除非內容資訊有跟版本一不一樣的地方

ai559031

超q小企鹅妈妈 发表于 2017-9-21 17:04
逻辑君，想问下35题，为什么不选
【除了这个人没有其他人看到这个珍稀动物】
...

哈摟
我剛剛跟另外一名狗主確認了
我一開始誤會題目的意思
答案應該是【除了这个人没有其他人看到这个珍稀动物】沒錯
我晚點會更正

超q小企鹅妈妈

ai559031 发表于 2017-9-21 23:43
哈摟
我剛剛跟另外一名狗主確認了
我一開始誤會題目的意思

非常感谢

Poppy洁

谢谢逻辑君~很清晰~