【逻辑】0914邏輯寂靜整理 (9/24 23:20 更新至#59+補充5）

RedXmas

我回忆起来，老人税收的问题。。
是说投资回报会有投资税，老人的税收率和一般人一样，然后说老人总体的收入来源中很大一部分钱是来自于投资收益。现在为了要改善老人的生活，政府决定减少对老人的税收率，即使平均下来每个老人只有多出1000美元的收入，但是这个收入足以让老人们在寒冬不心疼地开暖气，提升生活质量。问weaken

我选择的是：全国老人的投资收益的大部分都是由高产阶级的老人所拥有。

ai559031

RedXmas 发表于 2017-9-19 09:57
我回忆起来，老人税收的问题。。
是说投资回报会有投资税，老人的税收率和一般人一样，然后说老人总体的收 ...

好的 謝謝～～

就是打不死

厉害

就是打不死

好呀

就是打不死

好呀

Lanchenia

RedXmas 发表于 2017-9-19 09:57
我回忆起来，老人税收的问题。。
是说投资回报会有投资税，老人的税收率和一般人一样，然后说老人总体的收 ...

对的，我看到也想起来了，有着一道题。
问得是weaken,
但是我的选项没有你写的这个，
我选的跟你意思差不多，但是说法应该是不一样的，有几个数字的比例。
抱歉金鱼脑。 V 40

Lanchenia

还有第九题，答案是对的 可以秒选。

ai559031

Lanchenia 发表于 2017-9-20 17:17
还有第九题，答案是对的 可以秒选。

好的～ 謝謝

katehuang9512

谢谢逻辑君～～～

Liangll

逻辑君想问问这一题
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill- conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
12
(A) The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
(B) The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
(C) The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
(D) The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument's advocacy of a particular strategy.
(E) The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
OA.D

我理解第一个黑体是goal，但是第二个黑体说的是“只要地还可以种，那么农民就不会离开”，这个不是反对之前提出的方案吗，为什么正确选项里说是 argument's advocacy of a particular strategy.呢？