ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3624|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-10-12

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-8-29 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
The conclusion is "Mental states---> vulnerability of immune system". E show us that infections don't stem from disorder of the immune system, this is another story of disorder of the immune system, and has no any relationship with the argument.
沙发
发表于 2003-8-29 23:54:00 | 只看该作者
E is so wrong. Let me give you a simper example: sleepiness --> loss of concentration; hunger--> loss of concentration; Either of these two is not the basis to dispute the other. In another word, we cannot say that because sleepiness causes loss of concentration, hunger must not cause loss of concentration. Unless there is a exclusivity clause in the argument, such that only one reason cause loss of concentration.

You misundertood E. If E said that the disorder of immune system in this group of people stems from higher level of exposure, it is the right answer.
板凳
发表于 2005-7-9 15:41:00 | 只看该作者

我开始也选了E,但想了想,我认为主要错在 high frequency 上,文中并没有说严重程度,所以这个不能削弱

地板
发表于 2005-7-10 15:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用zhoushao在2005-7-9 15:41:00的发言:

我开始也选了E,但想了想,我认为主要错在 high frequency 上,文中并没有说严重程度,所以这个不能削弱



所以说,做逻辑题时,对关键词的把握和理解是非常重要的.
5#
发表于 2006-8-29 16:29:00 | 只看该作者

其实我做这题的时候,一看见A-->B,马上就想到反对的方式是它因或因果倒置,C显然就是因果倒置。E中的exposure不知为何物。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 01:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部