- UID
- 1286966
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2017-6-28
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
A lot of the information in the table just serves as a distraction here. The first column of the table gives us a standard 2-circle Venn diagram: those people who like M, those people who like N, and those people who like both. We want to know how many like both. If we know exactly how many people are in our diagram (i.e. how many people responded 'favourable' to at least one candidate), we can answer that question. Statement 1 tells us that 40 of the 100 people are *not* in our diagram, so 60 people must be in the diagram, and that info is sufficient. I can't draw a Venn diagram here, but I'd fill it in as follows:
Favorable for M only: 40 - x
Favorable for both M and N: x
Favorable for N only: 30 - x
From Statement 1 I know these three quantities add to 60, which gives me one equation in one unknown.
Statement 2 doesn't tell you how many people are in the diagram, so is not sufficient.
As for your question about using a 'matrix' or 'formula' here, I wouldn't consider doing either.
注:引用gmatclub的解释,感觉更清晰直观,且答案应该是10? |
|