求问OG17 RC倒数第二篇

sherryannwang

（如图，图貌似在最后面…，完整文章附在最后）请问这篇文章第一段中的feminist scholars和 Krontiris的work为什么又不同了呢，虽然第一段说了fs强调女性社会地位信仰不同导致问题复杂化，第二段说 Krontiris是研究中上层女作家的代表，但是像我图中标注的，第一段的trend和地二段的trend不是一个trend吗，那第一段和第二段这两个trend之间的逻辑关系是怎样的呢？
抱歉可能表述不太清楚，希望有牛牛来解答一下啦，谢谢！?

附完整文章：
Jacob Burckhardt's view that Renaissance European women "stood on a footing of perfect equality" with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women's inequality. In striking contrast to Burckhardt, Joan Kelly in her famous 1977 essay, "Did Women Have a Renaissance?" argued that the Renaissance was a period of economic and social decline for women relative both to Renaissance men and to medieval women. Recently, however, a significant trend among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly's dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt's rosy one. Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women—especially in terms of social status and religion—work to complicate the kinds of generalizations both Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of their observations about upper-class Italian women.

The trend is also evident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record. Such women were, simply by virtue of their literacy, members of a tiny minority of the population, so it is risky to take their descriptions of their experiences as typical of "female experience" in any general sense. Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers, does tend at times to conflate "women" and "women writers," assuming that women's gender, irrespective of other social differences, including literacy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make that group an object of analysis. Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant contribution to the field and is representative of those authors who offer what might be called a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women's achievements, although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced when they sought to raise their "oppositional voices." Krontiris is concerned to show women intentionally negotiating some power for themselves (at least in the realm of public discourse) against potentially constraining ideologies, but in her sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them.

violin9201

第一段结构：JB 观点→JK 观点（与 JB 相反）→a trend：既反对 JB又反对JK→反对原因：强调差异使得问题复杂化
第二段结构：即使是在中上社会阶层，a trend也存在→推广有风险→给出 TK 例子： TK混淆不同女性，并且所谓女权很多宣称都是表面，并未推翻潜在假设。

所以第二段的 trend 其实是比第一段结尾更小的一个概念，第一段说这种 trend 的产生是因为我们现在要考虑女性群体内部的差异了（比如社会地位 的差异），第二段则说即使是在中上层社会，这种 trend 也是明显的。然后后文给出了例子。但是例子中的 nonetheless 这句话到底作用是什么，我还是不是很清楚。

sherryannwang

violin9201 发表于 2017-7-13 22:52
第一段结构：JB 观点→JK 观点（与 JB 相反）→a trend：既反对 JB又反对JK→反对原因：强调差异使得问题复 ...

噢……我明白了！谢谢解答！我应该就是没读懂这两个trend是什么关系，以为她们是一个东西，而 Krontiris又是第二个trend的例子，所以有一道题目问 Krontiris和第一段feminist scholar的区别，我直接去nonetheless后面那儿去找了