ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1130|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-III-8

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-31 20:13:00 | 只看该作者

大全-III-8

State X’s income-averaging law allows a portion of one’s income to be taxed at lower rate than the rate based on one’s total taxable income. To use income averaging, the taxpayer must have earned taxable income for a particular year that exceeds 140 percent of his or her average taxable income for the previous three years. People using income averaging owe less tax for that year than they would without income averaging.


Which of the following individuals would be most seriously affected if income averaging were not permitted in computing the taxes owed for current year?


(A) Individuals whose income has steadily decreased for the past three years


(B) Individuals whose income increased by 50 percent four years ago and has remained the same since then


(C) Individuals whose income has doubled this year after remaining about the same for five years


(D) Individuals who had no income this year, but did in each of the previous three yearsC


(E) Individuals who are retired and whose income has remained about the same for the past ten years

沙发
发表于 2005-9-1 11:15:00 | 只看该作者

X州平均收入的政策允许以低税率而非基于总收入的高税率对纳税人的部分收入征税,要使用收入平均政策,纳税人某一年的收入应是前3年平均收入的1.4倍。使用了收入平均政策的人在这一年将少缴税。


C. 在过去5年中收入保持不变,而今年收入翻倍的人。


前三年平均收入X,今年收入2X, 满足上述条件。

如果没有平均收入政策,那么他受到的影响将最大。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 12:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部