- UID
- 1243142
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2016-10-19
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
The attribution of the choral work Lacrimae to the composer Pescard (1400–1474) has been regarded as tentative, since it was based on a single treatise from the early 1500s that named Pescard as the composer. Recently, several musical treatises from the late 1500s have come to light, all of which name Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae. Unfortunately, these newly discovered treatises lend no support to the attribution of Lacrimae to Pescard, since _______.
A、the treatise from the early 1500s misidentifies the composers of some of the musical works it considers
B、the author of the treatise from the early 1500s had no very strong evidence on which to base the identification of Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
C、there are works that can conclusively be attributed to Pescard that are not even mentioned in the treatise from the early 1500s
D、the later treatises probably had no source for their attribution other than the earlier treatise
E、no known treatises from the 1600s identify Pescard as the composer of Lacrimae
求助下这个题目,我看出来的文章内容是:
early 1500s 的treatise证实了一个事情。最近late 1500s 的treatise也指明了这个事情。但是最近的treatise并不起什么作用,问为什么?
所以选项里一定要提到最近的treatise,才能解释清楚为什么。就只有D提到了,选D。
希望大家看下我的解题思路,如果不对的话,有什么更好的思路来做,谢谢。
|
|