分享一点逻辑的心得

lisiberry

今天看看陈的书，觉得是站在出题人的立场给逻辑的5个选项很好的诠释。
造吗，出题人也很头疼。错误选项不能太简单，必须出的跟正确选项看起来很像。

alzn2765

“简单”题：
4个不相关，1个相关。相关的必然正确。
“难”题：
3个不相关，2个相关。2个相关的逻辑方向相反。

逻辑难的主要原因是中国人已经习惯了自己带入大量假设缺浑然不知。

lisiberry

alzn2765 发表于 2017-1-30 12:42
“简单”题：
4个不相关，1个相关。相关的必然正确。
“难”题：

谢谢发表意见，本来觉得你说的言简意赅，好像大多数人都知道。
没想到看了你的帖子，佩服的五体投地，居然做了这么多题，是经验之谈呀。
NN前辈，你是大家的榜样。恭喜你分手成功。一会再好好读一下你的心经。

alzn2765

lisiberry 发表于 2017-1-30 14:29
谢谢发表意见，本来觉得你说的言简意赅，好像大多数人都知道。
没想到看了你的帖子，佩服的五体投地，居 ...

能帮到你最重要。

乌鸦对镜梳妆

alzn2765 发表于 2017-1-30 12:42
“简单”题：
4个不相关，1个相关。相关的必然正确。
“难”题：

有的时候这种思路也容易造成误区哦，比如问由此结果进行更深一步推理那种，常常会因为看到一个选项好像和文章更相关而误选，但没有注意推理是否正确。（可能推理比较远啦看似与题目无关）：）

alzn2765

乌鸦对镜梳妆 发表于 2017-2-2 17:20
有的时候这种思路也容易造成误区哦，比如问由此结果进行更深一步推理那种，常常会因为看到一个选项好像和 ...

请举一个反例。比如OG或者prep上的题。

乌鸦对镜梳妆

alzn2765 发表于 2017-2-2 17:29
请举一个反例。比如OG或者prep上的题。

maybe OG17 595？就可能因为C和原文论据更相关直接选而没有认真读题看逻辑关系啦

alzn2765

乌鸦对镜梳妆 发表于 2017-2-2 17:46
maybe OG17 595？就可能因为C和原文论据更相关直接选而没有认真读题看逻辑关系啦 ...

The Testament of William Thorpe was published around 1530 as an appendix to Thorpe's longer Examination. Many scholars, however, doubt the attribution of the Testament to Thorpe because, whereas the Examination is dated 1406, the Testament is dated 1460. One scholar has recently argued that the 1460 date be amended to 1409, based on the observation that when these numbers are expressed as Roman numerals, MCCCCLX and MCCCCIX, it becomes easy to see how the dates might have become confused through scribal error.

Which of the following, if true, would most support the scholar's hypothesis concerning the date of the Testament?

(A) The sole evidence that historians have had that William Thorpe died no earlier than 1460 was the presumed date of publication of the Testament.
(B) In the preface to the 1530 publication, the editor attributes both works to William Thorpe.
(C) Few writers in fifteenth-century England marked dates in their works using only Roman numerals.
(D) The Testament alludes to a date, "Friday, September 20," as apparently contemporaneous with the writing of the Testament, and September 20 fell on a Friday in 1409 but not in 1460.
(E) The Testament contains few references to historical events that occurred later than 1406.

这题只有D相关。
C说很少只用Roman numerals，但没说另一种是不是比Roman numerals更容易混淆。除非你带入额外的假设，否则C永远无关。

beyouuu

你好，请问这个是什么书啊