ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1199|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

XDF-25居然没人问过,请教第4题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-23 22:52:00 | 只看该作者

XDF-25居然没人问过,请教第4题

Passage 25


     In 1977 the prestigious Ewha Women’s University in


Seoul, Korea, announced the opening of the first


women’s studies program in Asia. Few academic


programs have ever received such public attention. In


(5) broadcast debates, critics dismissed the program as a


betrayal of national identity, an imitation of Western


ideas, and a distraction from the real task of national


unification and economic development. Even supporters


underestimated the program ; they thought it would be


(10) merely another of the many Western ideas that had


already proved useful in Asian culture, akin to airlines,


electricity, and the assembly line. The founders of the


program, however, realized that neither view was


correct. They had some reservations about the appli-


(15) cability of Western feminist theories to the role of


women in Asia and felt that such theories should be


closely examined. Their approach has thus far yielded


important critiques of Western theory, informed by the


special experience of Asian women.


(20)   For instance, like the Western feminist critique of the


Freudian model of the human psyche, the Korean critique finds Freudian theory culture-bound, but in


ways different from those cited by Western theorists.


The Korean theorists claim that Freudian theory


(25) assumes the universality of the Western nuclear, male-


headed family and focuses on the personality formation


of the individual, independent of society, An analysis


based on such assumptions could be valid for a highly


competitive, individualistic society. In the Freudian


(30) family drama, family members are assumed to be


engaged in a Darwinian struggle against each other


father against son and sibling against sibling. Such a


concept of projects the competitive model of Western


society onto human personalities. But in the Asian


(35) concept of personality there is no ideal attached to indi


vidualism or to the independent self. The Western model


of personality development does not explain major char-


acteristics of the Korean personality, which is social and


group-centered. The “self” is a social being defined by


(40) and acting in a group, and the well-being of both men


and women is determined by the equilibrium of the


group, not by individual self-assertion. The ideal is one


of interdependency.


    In such a context, what is recognized as “depen-


(45) dency” in Western psychiatric terms is not, in Korean


terms, an admission of weakness or failure. All this bears


directly on the Asian perception of men’s and women’s


psychology because men are also “ dependent”, In


Korean culture, men cry and otherwise easily show their


(50) emotions, something that might be considered a betrayal


of masculinity in Western culture. In the kinship-based


society of Korea, four generations may live in the same


house, which means that people can be sons and daugh-


ters all their lives, whereas in Western culture, the roles


of husband and son, wife and daughter, are often incom-


patible.




4. It can be inferred from the passage that the broadcast


  media in Korea considered the establishment of the


  Ewha women’s studies program


  (A) praiseworthy


  (B) insignificant


  (C) newsworthy


  (D) imitative


  (E) incomprehensible


就是这道态度题了,答案是c,我觉得是E。

沙发
发表于 2005-8-23 23:22:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-24 03:54:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢给的连接,不过好像连接里面只有提问,没有回答啊。


继续请教分析答案。

地板
发表于 2005-8-24 12:27:00 | 只看该作者
Few academic

programs have ever received such public attention. In


(5) broadcast debates, critics dismissed the program as a


betrayal of national identity, an imitation of Western


ideas, and a distraction from the real task of national


unification and economic development.


有关broadcast的论述也就上述所在了。从上看来,C是最可能的答案了。

5#
发表于 2006-4-4 13:36:00 | 只看该作者
6#
发表于 2006-8-12 21:49:00 | 只看该作者

 Few academic programs have ever received such public attention. In broadcast debates, critics dismissed the program as a betrayal of national identity, an imitation of Western ideas, and a distraction from the real task of national unification and economic development.
        

同错,发现理解能力一直上不去

首先,定位于这两句话。

第一句说从来没有哪个program获得这么大的公众注意力,第二句说在媒体看来又有***,***,***一堆缺点批评了一番。

那么看来,对于媒体,program的价值确实只有新闻炒作的价值了.

愁死我了,不知说的对不对。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-1 17:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部