Two Kaplan CRs

braveMBA

[attachimg]3178[/attachimg]

说SC不支持REDUCE THE BENIFIT PACKAGE ，DOES ALLOW IMPROVEMENT。3，为何不对？如果G不可能VETO，则就不会成为OBSTACLE。

albert

3 is correct,right?

braveMBA

YES，4为何？

albert

there are 2 factors could,possibly,  lead to the failure of new plan...

by eliminate one factor(the assumption, 3), then the only bossible factor is the other one..

we don't care whether the other one is possibe.. even if the other one is not possible, the line of reasoning is correct...

johnson_zhang

I have the same problem when testing for Kaplan. After careful thought, I knew that the reason why I choose the wrong option is that I understand the 1st sentence wrongly.

"it" in the 1st sentence doesn't refer to State Constituion, but refer to Legislature. So you can get the evidence "State Constituion and Legislature allow improvment of package" and conclusion "Only govenor doesn't support the new pension program". The assumption is surely 3.

4 is wrong cause it's the conclusion.

Hope explain clearly.

braveMBA

Thanks for your explanation. But I do think 'it' represents State Constitution. Now I am clear. The argument gives us clue that the only obstacle of new program is the possibility that governor will probably veto the program, so there must be a premise that State Constitution will support the program, or the program will definitely be fail. Am I right?

johnson_zhang

Yeah, you are right. "it" refers to State Constitution...