ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1384|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-1-17

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-21 17:55:00 | 只看该作者

大全-1-17

17.   Companies considering new cost-cutting manufacturing processes often compare the projected results of making the investment against the alternative of not making the investment with costs, selling prices, and share of market remaining constant.


Which of the following, assuming that each is a realistic possibility, constitutes the most serious disadvantage for companies of using the method above for evaluating the financial benefit of new manufacturing processes?


(A) The costs of materials required by the new process might not be known with certainty.


(B) In several years interest rates might go down, reducing the interest costs of borrowing money to pay for the investment.


(C) Some cost-cutting processes might require such expensive investments that there would be no net gain for many years, until the investment was paid for by savings in the manufacturing process.


(D) Competitors that do invest in a new process might reduce their selling prices and thus take market share away from companies that do not.D


(E) The period of year chosen for averaging out the cost of the investment might be somewhat longer or shorter, thus affecting the result.


请教此题为何选D啊,我选了C,请指教,谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-22 19:23:48编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-8-21 20:33:00 | 只看该作者
C仍然考虑的成本(COST),是企业内部的因素.如果按这种方向考虑得出的结论肯定是不采用新的流程.D是企业外部(COMPETITORS)因素,如果不考虑这个因素,市场份额被采用新流程的竞争对手夺走,对企业将是极大不利.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-22 19:29:00 | 只看该作者

thank u!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-17 13:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部