ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 人间烟火Sue
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[AWA模板] 【作文6.0小分队】范文分享,回馈CD,祝大家都杀G顺利

[复制链接]
21#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-11-25 13:54:09 | 只看该作者

同意!               
22#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-11-25 13:56:57 | 只看该作者
   我就知道一发出来就会乱,格式得编辑编辑再编辑....
   然而还是会有合在一起的地方,辛苦大家将就一下了。

     【11】   
      
      The conclusion in this argument is that the state legislature need not consider the
views ofprotesting students. To support this conclusion, the author points out thatonly
200 ofthe 12,000 students traveled to the state capitol to voice their concerns about
proposedcuts in college programs. Since the remaining students did not take part inthis
protest,the author concludes they are not interested in this issue. The reasoning inthis
argument is flawed for two reasons.
       First, the author assumes that because only one-tenth of the students took part in
theprotest, these students' views are unrepresentative of the entire student body.This
assumptionis unwarranted. If it turns out, for example, that the protesting students were
randomlyselected from the entire student body, their views would reflect the views of
theentire college. Without information regarding the way in which the protesting
studentswere selected, it is presumptuous to conclude that their opinions fail to reflect
the opinions of their colleagues.
       Second, the author cites the fact that the remaining 12,000 students stayed on
campus orleft for winter break as evidence that they are not concerned about their
education.One obvious rejoinder to this line of reasoning is that the students who did
notparticipate did so when they that their concerns would be expressed by the
protestingstudents. In any case, the author has failed to demonstrate a logical
connectionbetween the students' alleged lack of concern and the fact that they either
stayed oncampus or left for winter break. Without this connection, the conclusion
reachedby the author that the remaining 12,000 students are not concerned about their
education is unacceptable.
       As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logically acceptable,
theauthor would have to demonstrate that the protesting students had some
characteristicin common that biases their views, thereby nullifying their protest as
representative of the entire college.

23#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-11-28 09:56:35 | 只看该作者
【12】      

      The recommendation endorsed in this argument is that residents of San Perdito
votecurrent mayor Montoya out of office, and re-elect former mayor Varro. Thereasons
cited arethat during Montoya's four years in office the population has decreased while
unemploymenthas increased, whereas during Varro's term unemployment declined
while thepopulation grew. This argument involves the sort of gross oversimplification
andemotional appeal typical of political rhetoric; for this reason it is unconvincing.
       First of all, the author assumes that the Montoya administration caused the
unemploymentin San Perdito as well as its population loss. The line of reasoning is that
becauseMontoya was elected before the rise in unemployment and the decline in
population,the former event caused the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless
otherpossible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example,
perhaps astatewide or nationwide recession is the cause of these events. Or perhaps the
currenteconomic downturn is part of a larger picture of economic cycles and trends,
and hasnothing to do with who happens to be mayor. Yet another possibility is that
Varroenjoyed a period of economic stability and Varro's own administration set the
stage forthe unemployment and the decline in population the city is now experiencing
under Montoya.
       Secondly,job availability and the economic health of one's community are issues
thataffect people emotionally. The argument at hand might have been intentionally
oversimplifiedfor the specific purpose of angering citizens of San Perdito, and thereby
turningthem against the incumbent mayor. Arguments that bypass relevant, complex
reasoningin favor of stirring up emotions do nothing to establish their conclusions;they
are also unfair to the parties involved.
       In conclusion, I would not cast my vote for Varro on the basis of this weak
argument.The author must provide support for the assumption that Mayor Montoya has
causedSan Perdito's poor economy. Moreover, such support would have to involve
examiningand eliminating other possible causal factors. Only with more convincing
evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.

24#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-11-28 10:00:01 | 只看该作者
天气这么好,大家应该学习起来了~
25#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-11-30 16:06:57 | 只看该作者
      
【13】

         The conclusion of this argument is thatadvertising the reduced price of selected
items inthe Daily Gazette will result in increased sales overall. To support it, theauthor
cites aninformal poll conducted by sales clerks when customers purchased advertised
items.Each time one or more of the advertised items was sold, the clerks askedwhether
thecustomer had read the ad. It turned out that two-thirds of 200 shoppersquestioned
said thatthey had read the ad. In addition, of those who reported reading the ad, more
than half spent over $100 in the store. This argument is unconvincing for two reasons.
       To begin with, the author's line of reasoning is that the advertisement was the
cause ofthe purchase of the sale items. However, while the poll establishes a ion
betweenreading the ad and purchasing sale items, and also indicates a correlation,
thoughless significantly, between reading the ad and buying non-sale t does not
establisha general causal relationship between these events. To establish this
relationship,other factors that could bring about this result must be 'red and eliminated.
Forexample, if the four days during which the poll was conducted preceded
Thanksgivingand the advertised items were traditionally associated with this holiday,
then the results of the poll would be extremely biased and unreliable.
       Moreover,the author assumes that the poll indicates that advertising certain sale
willcause a general increase in sales. But the poll does not even address the issueof
increasedoverall sales; it informs us mainly that, of the people who purchased sales
items,more had read the ad than not. A much clearer indicator of the ad'seffectiveness
would bea comparison of overall sales on days the ad ran with overall sales on
otherwise similar days when the ad did not run.
       In sum, this argument is defective mainly because the poll does not support the
conclusionthat sales in general will increase when reduced-price products are
advertisedin the Daily Gazette. To strengthen the argument, the author must, at the very
least,provide comparisons of overall sales reports as described above.


26#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-11-30 16:09:20 | 只看该作者
大家没有回复,我也不知道大家有没有看呀...有在好好学习吗?
27#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-12-2 12:22:50 | 只看该作者
  【14】
      In an attempt to sell radio advertising time, this ad claims that radio advertising
will makebusinesses more profitable. The evidence cited is a ten percent increase in
businessthat the Cumquat Cafe has experienced in the year during which it advertised
on thelocal radio station. This argument is unconvincing because two questionable
assumptionsmust be made for the stated evidence to support the authors conclusion.
       The first assumption is that radio advertising alone has caused the increase in
businessat the Cumquat Cafe. This assumption is questionable because it overlooks a
number ofother factors that might have contributed to the Cumquat's success. For
example,the Cumquat might have changed owners or chefs; it might have launched a
coupon adcampaign in the local print media; or it might have changed or updated the
menu. Yetanother possibility is that a local competitor went out of business. These are
just afew of the factors that could help explain the Cumquat's growth. Because the
authorfails to eliminate these possibilities, the assumption in question need not be
accepted.
       Evenif it is granted that radio advertising is responsible for the Cumquat's
success,another assumption must be made before we can conclude that radio
advertisingwill result in increased profits for businesses in general. We must also
assumethat what is true of the Cumquat will likewise be true of most otherbusinesses.
But thereare all kinds of important differences between cafes and other businesses that
couldaffect how radio audiences react to their advertising. We cannot safely assume
thatbecause a small restaurant has benefited from radio advertising, that any andall
localbusinesses will similarly benefit.
       In conclusion, it would be imprudent for a business to invest in radio advertising
solely onthe basis of the evidence presented. To strengthen the conclusion, it must be
establishedthat radio advertising was the principal cause of increased business at the
Cumquat.Once this is shown, it must be determined that the business in question is
sufficientlylike the Cumquat, and so can expect similar returns from investment in
radio adtime.

28#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-12-5 15:40:47 | 只看该作者

【15】

Two yearsago Nova High School began to use interactive computer instruction in
threeacademic subjects. The school dropout rate declined immediately and last year's
graduateshave reported some impressive achievements in college. In future budgets the
schoolboard should use a greater portion of the available funds to buy morecomputers,
and theschools in the district should adopt interactive computer instructionthroughout
thecurriculum.


SampleEssay 1:
       The argument that the school board should buy more computers and adopt
interactivecomputer instruction is not entirely logically convincing, since it ignores
certain crucial assumptions.
       First,the argument assumes that the decline of school dropout and the
achievementsof last year's graduates' results from the adoption of interactive computer
instruction.However, there are several reasons why this might not be true. For example,
achievementscould have been made in other subjects than the ones with interactive
computerinstruction. Or last years' graduates might not have been given the interactive
computerinstruction. Or the decline of the rate of dropout could be attributed tostricter
discipline applied last year.
        Second, even supposing the Nova HighSchool's decline of the dropout and last
year'sgraduates' achievements benefit directly from the usage of interactive computer
instruction,the success of the instruction in one school may not ensure the success in
otherschools. If it does not suit other schools, the instruction will not work.
        Finally, even if the decline of the rateof dropout and the achievements of the last
year'sgraduates' are the direct results of the interactive computer instruction, westill do
not knowwhether the school can afford to apply the instruction on all the subjects orto
all thestudents. If the school does not have sufficient fund and has to cut budgets on
other projects such as the library, the quality of the school's education will also
compromise.         
       Thus, the argument is not completely sound. The evidence in support of the
conclusionthat the dropout rate declined and last year's graduates made impressive
achievementsdoes little to prove the conclusion-that other schools should use a greater
portionof their funds to apply the instruction-since it does not address theassumptions I
havealready raised. Ultimately, the argument might have been strengthened by making
it clearthat the decline of the dropout rate and the achievements of the graduates arethe
directresults of interactive computer instruction, that the instruction is alsoapplicable to
otherschools in the district, and that the instruction is affordable to all the schools in the
district.

29#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-12-7 13:53:56 | 只看该作者
【16】


Sample Essay 2:
       The editorial recommends that the school board of Nova High spend a greater
portionof available funds on the purchase of additional computers and adoptinteractive
computerinstruction throughout the curriculum. Two reasons are offered in support of
thisrecommendation. First, the introduction of interactive computer instruction inthree
academicsubjects was immediately followed by a decline in the school dropout rate.
Second,last year's graduates experienced impressive achievements in college. This
argumentis unconvincing for two reasons.
       To begin with, this argument is a classic instance of "after this, thereforebecause
ofthis" reasoning. The mere fact that the introduction of interactivecomputer
instructionpreceded the impressive performance of recent graduates and the decline in
thedropout rate is insufficient to conclude that it was the cause of these events.Many
otherfactors could bring about these same results. For example, the school may have
implementedcounseling and training programs that better meet the needs of students
who mightotherwise leave school to take jobs. In addition, the school may have
introduced programs to better prepare students for college.
       Secondly,the author assumes that the impressive achievements of last year's
graduatesbear some relation to the introduction of interactive computer instruction at
NovaHigh. However, no evidence is offered to support this assumption. Lacking
evidencethat links the achievements of the recent graduates to the interactive
instruction,it is presumptuous to suggest that the computer instruction was in some way
responsiblefor the students' impressive performance.
       In conclusion, the recommendation that Nova High spend a greater portion of
availablefunds on the purchase of additional computers and adopt interactive computer
instructionthroughout the curriculum is ill-founded. To strengthen this recommendation
theauthor would have to demonstrate that the decline in the dropout rate and the
impressiveperformance of recent graduates came about as a result of the use of
computer-interactiveinstruction. All that has been shown so far is a correlation between
these events.

30#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-12-9 13:06:51 | 只看该作者
【17】

        This political advertisement recommendsre-electing governor Adams because he
has aproven leadership role in improving the state's economy. In support of thisreason
theauthor cites these statistics: in the past year, most state workers' wages havegone up;
5,000 newjobs have been created; and six corporations have located in the state.
Anotherreason offered for re-electing Adams is a recent poll, which indicates thatmost
respondentsbelieve the state economy would continue to improve if he were re-elected.
Finally,the author claims that rival Zebulon would harm the state's economy because he
disagreeswith Adams' fiscal policies. This argument is fraught with vague,
oversimplified and unwarranted claims.
       To begin with, the statistics are intended to support the main claim that thestate is
economicallybetter off with Adams as governor. But these statistics are vague and
oversimplified,and thus may distort the state's overall economic picture. For example,
stateworkers' pay raises may have been minuscule and may not have kept up with cost
of livingor with pay for state workers in other states. Moreover, the 5,000 new jobs may
have beentoo few to bring state unemployment rates down significantly; at the same
time,many jobs may have been lost. Finally, the poll indicates that six newcorporations
located in the state, but fails to indicate if any left.
       Next,the poll cited by the author is described in the vaguest possible terms. The
ad doesnot indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or how the poll was
conducted.Until these questions are answered, the survey results are worthless as
evidencefor public opinion about Adams or his economic policies.
       Finally,while we have only vague and possibly distorted evidence that the state is
betteroff with Adams, we have absolutely no evidence that it would be worse off with
Zebulon.Given that the state economy is good at the moment, none of the author's
reasonsestablishes that Adams is the cause of this. And neither do they establish that
the state wouldn't be even better off with someone else in office.
       In conclusion, this argument is weak. To strengthen the argument, the author must
provideadditional information about the adequacy of state workers' pay raises, the
effect ofthe 5,000 jobs on the state's employment picture, the overall growth of
corporationsin the state, and other features of the state economy. Also, the author must
supportthe claims that Adams' actions have caused any economic improvement and
that inthe future Adams will impart more economic benefit than would Zebulon.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-20 09:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部