【17】
This political advertisement recommendsre-electing governor Adams because he has aproven leadership role in improving the state's economy. In support of thisreason theauthor cites these statistics: in the past year, most state workers' wages havegone up; 5,000 newjobs have been created; and six corporations have located in the state. Anotherreason offered for re-electing Adams is a recent poll, which indicates thatmost respondentsbelieve the state economy would continue to improve if he were re-elected. Finally,the author claims that rival Zebulon would harm the state's economy because he disagreeswith Adams' fiscal policies. This argument is fraught with vague, oversimplified and unwarranted claims. To begin with, the statistics are intended to support the main claim that thestate is economicallybetter off with Adams as governor. But these statistics are vague and oversimplified,and thus may distort the state's overall economic picture. For example, stateworkers' pay raises may have been minuscule and may not have kept up with cost of livingor with pay for state workers in other states. Moreover, the 5,000 new jobs may have beentoo few to bring state unemployment rates down significantly; at the same time,many jobs may have been lost. Finally, the poll indicates that six newcorporations located in the state, but fails to indicate if any left. Next,the poll cited by the author is described in the vaguest possible terms. The ad doesnot indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or how the poll was conducted.Until these questions are answered, the survey results are worthless as evidencefor public opinion about Adams or his economic policies. Finally,while we have only vague and possibly distorted evidence that the state is betteroff with Adams, we have absolutely no evidence that it would be worse off with Zebulon.Given that the state economy is good at the moment, none of the author's reasonsestablishes that Adams is the cause of this. And neither do they establish that the state wouldn't be even better off with someone else in office. In conclusion, this argument is weak. To strengthen the argument, the author must provideadditional information about the adequacy of state workers' pay raises, the effect ofthe 5,000 jobs on the state's employment picture, the overall growth of corporationsin the state, and other features of the state economy. Also, the author must supportthe claims that Adams' actions have caused any economic improvement and that inthe future Adams will impart more economic benefit than would Zebulon.
|