PREP 08 中第108题，求大神指导

migaloo33

Magazine Publisher:  Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.  It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position.  Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.
Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher's response?
A. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book
B. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned
C. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews
D. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
E. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes

我看了herl大神的分类，这个题被分在果因类别。虽然题会做，但实在对这个题分类有点不太懂。

cicitotheblue

我最近也在学习helr。这是我个人想法，你可以参考下。
果因推理的意思是从逻辑上来说，前提和结论谁先发生谁后发生。 在这道题里面，前提：杂志社收到了一个conservative view的review后，杂志社要在得到了另外的liberal position的review之后才会发表。 结论：杂志社的行动并不是因为对liberal view的偏见，而是为了平衡不同的意见。
逻辑上来看应该是杂志社为了平衡不同的意见，所以他们要在收到了liberal view的review之后才发表-->结论在先，前提为后。