求助OG上一道题！按照Helr的分类方法反而蒙了，所以这道题到底是果因还是类比？

cyranvvv

OG15 107. Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened. (B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores. (C) At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had. (D) Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades. (E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson’s. 最开始看认为结论是 those locations will not stay vacant for long. 再后来又觉得是helr讲的果因，结论是In the five years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s.最后这句话，来解释前面那些位置不会空很久。 果因的话，按照helr的CQ方向，是他因来解释果，或者这个果因没有联系。 之后该怎么分析。。。完全懵了。。。 另外这题都说是类比，到底是类比还是果因？要怎么区分看出来啊？？？ 已经耗费一晚上加一上午了！还是没想明白！求大神帮助！！！万分感谢！！！

cyranvvv

求大神们帮助

steven

由于前提和结论讨论的事件相同，所以本题为类比推理。原题大概说的是：
虽然 出现了 S 的竞争，但购物区中的店倒闭后也不会空太久。因为 C 出现时，就没有空太久。


推理结构为：
前提：C出现后，购物区倒闭之后位置没空着。
结论：S出现后，购物区倒闭之后位置也不会空着。

cyranvvv

steven 发表于 2016-10-9 10:30
由于前提和结论讨论的事件相同，所以本题为类比推理。原题大概说的是：
虽然 出现了 S 的竞争，但购物区中的店 ...

请问为什么讨论的相同就是类比了？不是很明白 方便举个简单例子么～感激不尽～

steven

cyranvvv 发表于 2016-10-9 11:38
请问为什么讨论的相同就是类比了？不是很明白 方便举个简单例子么～感激不尽～ ...

题目拿 C 出现后 G地区的店铺不会空，推出 S 出现后，G 地区店铺也不会空。这种类型就是类比推理了。

其他类似的，比如《邹忌讽齐王纳谏》，邹忌做了类比推理：两个对象分别为“邹忌的容貌”和“齐王的治国”，既然邹忌的身边人可以因为某些原因而骗邹忌说他好看，那么齐王身边人也可以因为某些原因而骗齐王。



类比推理，有两个方法可以对题目进行评估，一个是找出前提和结论之间的相同/区别。另一个是找出其他的一个条件是否成立。这样来判断是否支持/削弱结论

这里B 给出的就是提出了一个区别。

毕出-Helr

steven 发表于 2016-10-11 12:11
题目拿 C 出现后 G地区的店铺不会空，推出 S 出现后，G 地区店铺也不会空。这种类型就是类比推理了。

其 ...

我去...大神啊！

steven

毕出-Helr 发表于 2016-10-12 10:56
我去...大神啊！

别闹，这不是你教我的么。。。