好心的大神帮帮忙

starchoi

78.   (32009-!-item-!-188;#058&006754)

Kitchenmagazine plans to license the use of its name by a line of cookware.  For a magazine, licensing the use of its namefor products involves some danger, since if the products disappoint consumers,the magazine's reputation suffers, with consequent reductions in circulationand advertising.  However, experts haveevaluated the cookware and found it superior to all other cookware advertisedin Kitchen.  Therefore, Kitchen cancollect its licensing fee without endangering its other revenues.

Theargument above assumes which of the following?

BC

A. Noother line of cookware is superior to that which will carry the Kitchen name.

B.Kitchen will not license the use of its name for any products other than theline of cookware.

C. Makers of cookware will not findKitchen a less attractive advertising vehicle because the magazine's name isassociated with a competing product.

D.Consumers who are not regular readers of Kitchen magazine will be attracted tothe cookware by the Kitchen name.

E.Kitchen is one of the most prestigious cooking-related magazines.

请问各位大神为什么无法选择B选项，题目说这种厨房用具比其他的好，所以把名字许可给它不会有风险，那么B选项排除了杂志会把名字许可给其他产品的可能，从而减少了因为其他不确定的产品而增加风险的可能，不应该就是本文的假设吗？

还有C选项为何可以作为题目的假设，我有点无法理解，有哪位大神可以帮我解释下C的逻辑链吗？

starchoi

有大神可以帮帮忙吗

点点小允

首先对b项取非：Kitchen will license the use of its name for any products other than theline of cookware.
文中没有提到其它cookware的情况，只是知道它没有授权的那种cookware好，但不知道它们是否能影响revenue。不影响结论
对于c
取非：Makers of cookware will findKitchen a less attractive advertising vehicle because the magazine's name isassociated with a competing product.
既然cookware的人都发现这个杂志没什么广告效果了，那必然影响cookware人的行为，即换成别家广告或者xxxx，总归就是很大可能不找这个杂志做广告。那么就影响了结论：这家杂志收不到license fee。结论不成立