一、首先题干:Which of the following, if true, argues most strongly against concluding, on the basis of the information above, that the oceanographers’ hypothesis is false? 我认为是问“以下哪个选项最能削弱结论,即海洋地理学家的假设是错的?” 和楼上各位看法不同,因为已经问“argue...against concluding”,后面的that 宾语从句是修饰这个concluding的,怕大家不太明白concluding是什么,补充说明而已。没有双重否定问问题那么复杂啦~~~ 二、原题推理:oceanographers hypothesize that this shortage of iron prevents plankton from thriving. 因此要削弱则是“并不是iron的短缺使p存活受阻”,即p减少与iron无关。 三、因此:B: Certain areas of the ocean support an abundance of plankton despite having particularly low concentrations of iron. 说iron低的有些地方,p仍然abundance呢。因此削弱了iron对p的影响力。 四、其他选项:D: A few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the iron-rich water from the surface. 大家可能多推理了一步,这句话没说iron water转移与p的具体关系啊~多想了~
大家可能多推理了一步,这句话没说iron water转移与p的具体关系啊~多想了~ 因此与原文推理最紧密相关的是B。
欢迎讨论,共同进步!
欢迎讨论,共同进步! D: A few days after the iron compounds were released, ocean currents displaced the iron-rich water from the surface. 大家可能多推理了一步,这句话没说iron water转移与p的具体关系啊~多想了~
大家可能多推理了一步,这句话没说iron water转移与p的具体关系啊~多想了~ 因此与原文推理最紧密相关的是B。
欢迎讨论,共同进步!
欢迎讨论,共同进步!
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-16 22:41:37编辑过] |