ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz' that discuss one of Newton's books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton's calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz' own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. Leibniz' notes are limited to early sections of Newton's book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton's calculus concepts and techniques are presented.

In the historian's reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2369|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求大神解答一道黑脸题,二选一总是错

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-6-8 15:15:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented. In the historian’s reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

AThe first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is evidence that has been used to support an opposing position  分析A选项

BThe first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is that position  分析B选项

CThe first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion  分析C选项

DThe first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian’s own position  分析D选项

EThe first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is further information that substantiates that evidence  分析E选项


E为什么不对呢?答案是D
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-6-8 15:49:06 | 只看该作者
第二个boldfaced的部分是用来支持historian自己的观点的,不是支持前面那个evidence的
板凳
发表于 2016-6-9 11:07:01 | 只看该作者
A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however.
注意这个however,前后观点并不一致,最后面那句是作者自己的观点,和前面并不是同一类。
无数次的教训(此处伴有眼泪)告诉我黑脸题一定要时刻注意找however这类转折词!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 19:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部