Help！！OG16 105

dudu122

求各位大神帮忙指点一下！

105.  Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been
buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried
by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly
relieved. They reason that, since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s
financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. Such reasoning might
well be overoptimistic, however, since corporate executives have been known
to buy shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel
negative rumors about the company’s health.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following
roles?
(A) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a
conclusion; the second gives a reason for questioning that support.
(B) The first describes evidence that has been taken as supporting a
conclusion; the second states a contrary conclusion that is the main
conclusion of the argument.
(C) The first provides evidence in support of the main conclusion of the
argument; the second states that conclusion.
(D) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks
to explain; the second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to
establish.
(E) The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks
to explain; the second provides evidence in support of the explanation that
the argument seeks to establish



请问 到底哪句话是conclusion？

alzn2765

C: Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic

dudu122

alzn2765 发表于 2016-5-20 13:17
C: Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic

我做的时候也认为结论是Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic  
可是
OG上给的答案是A  ！
然而  The first bold sentence 根本就没有支持Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic 呀。。。
我总觉得The first bold sentence就是一个circumstance 因为它描述的是一个fact  

T T我这样想是不是有问题 。。

alzn2765

dudu122 发表于 2016-5-25 12:04
我做的时候也认为结论是Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic  
可是
OG上给的答案是A  ！

A说的第一个BF是support a conclusion，而不是support the main conclusion。也就是说只要BF1是论据即可，BF1可以支持“a conclusion”就可以，不一定必须是main conclusion。

dudu122

alzn2765 发表于 2016-5-25 13:06
A说的第一个BF是support a conclusion，而不是support the main conclusion。也就是说只要BF1是论据即可 ...

哦！原来是这样！我懂了！真的太谢谢你了！呜呜呜

木三三

嘤嘤 想问D哪里错了